Skip to main content

Table 2 Relation between typical enhancement pattern for hemangioma in successive phases of dynamic CT/MR studies (homogeneous enhancement in HAP, PVP and EP or nodular peripheral/globular enhancement in HAP with progressive fill-in enhancement in PVP and EP) and detectable lesions in three groups: small, large and all lesions.

From: Is hepatotropic contrast enhanced MR a more effective method in differential diagnosis of hemangioma than multi-phase CT and unenhanced MR?

Groups and subgroups

Homogeneous enhancement in HAP, PVP and EP (number of foci)

Nodular peripheral/globular enhancement in HAP with progressive fill-in enhancement in PVP and EP (number of foci)

small HH-group

30

9

small nonHH-group

20

1

large HH-group

11

25

large nonHH-group

5

5

all size HH-group

41

34

all size nonHH-group

25

6