Skip to main content

Table 3 Estimated risks of PN weaning

From: A potential anatomic subtype of short bowel syndrome: a matched case-control study

 

Unadjusted model

Adjusted model

Odds ratio

95 % CI

p-value

Odds ratio

95 % CI

p-value

a) Using Cox proportional hazards regression

 IP groupa

1.74

[0.99, 3.05]

0.05

2.69

[1.27, 5.70]

0.01

 Age

1.01

[0.99, 1.03]

0.59

0.94

[0.88, 1.00]

0.06

 Male

0.84

[0.46, 1.54]

0.57

1.67

[0.68, 4.08]

0.26

 BMI

1.06

[0.95, 1.18]

0.32

1.41

[0.98, 2.03]

0.06

 Etiology for SBSb

1.14

[0.58, 2.42]

0.70

0.60

[0.28, 1.28]

0.18

 Remnant intestine length

1.07

[1.05, 1.09]

<0.01

1.09

[1.06, 1.12]

<0.01

b) Using conditional logistic regression with 1:2 matchingc

 IP group

4.84

[2.02, 11.56]

<0.01

   
  1. a IP group, ileum predominated group; Jejunum predominated group was reference group
  2. b Mesenteric vascular disease was covariates; Small bowel volvulus was reference group
  3. c IP cases and JP controls were matched by sex and length of intestine (±10 cm)