Skip to main content

Table 1 Characteristics of included studies

From: Endoscopic imaging modalities for diagnosing invasion depth of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Reference number

Year

Sample size

Modality

Image enhancement

Classification

EUS method

EUS frequencies, MHz

Confirmatory study

25

1997

74

Non-ME

Non

-

-

-

Esophagectomy/ER

26

2010

236

Non-ME

Non

-

-

-

Esophagectomy/ER

27

2015

49

Non-ME/ME

NBI

Arima and Inoue

-

-

Esophagectomy/ER

28

1998

30

ME

Non

Arima

-

-

Esophagectomy/ER

29

2002

79

ME

Non

Inoue

-

-

Esophagectomy/ER

30

2006

12

ME

Non

Inoue

-

-

ER

31

2010

510

ME

FICE

Arima

-

-

Esophagectomy/ER

32

2014

220

ME

NBI

JES

-

-

ER

33

2014

249

ME

NBI

JES

-

-

ER

34

2014

464

ME

NBI

JES

-

-

Esophagectomy/ER

35

1995

40

EUS

-

-

Radial and/or mini-probe

7.5,12,20

Esophagectomy/ER

36

2006

40

EUS

-

-

Mini-probe

20

Esophagectomy/ER

37

2006

132

EUS

-

-

Radial and/or mini-probe

7.5,10,20

Esophagectomy/ER

38

2011

145

EUS

-

-

Mini-probe

20,30

Esophagectomy/ER

  1. Non-ME non-magnified endoscopy; ME magnified endoscopy; EUS endoscopic ultrasound; IE Image enhancement method; FICE FUJI Intelligent Color Enhancement system; NBI Narrow band imaging system; Arima Arima’s classification; Inoue Inoue’s classification; JES Japan esophageal society classification; ER endoscopic resection