Skip to main content

Table 3 Relation of the prevalence of IP with gastroesophageal reflux parameters and with different categories of Barrett’s esophagus

From: The prevalence of gastric heterotopia of the proximal esophagus is underestimated, but preneoplasia is rare - correlation with Barrett’s esophagus

 

Prevalence of IP in the condition

Prevalence of the condition in patients with IP

Prevalence of the condition in patients without IP

Level of statistical significance (Fisher’s exact test, two-sided)

Number (%)

Number (%)

Number (%)

 

Dominant reflux symptoms

15/93 (16%)

15 (27%)

78 (24%)

p = 0.61

Hiatal hernia

13/83 (16%)

13 (24%)

70 (22%)

p = 0.74

Reflux esophagitis

14/75 (19)%

14 (26%)

61 (19%)

p = 0.25

CLE ≥ 0.5 cm

21/95 (22%)

21 (39%)

74 (23%)

p = 0.02

CLE ≥ 3 cm

4/18 (22)%

4 (7%)

14 (4%)

p = 0.31

CLE ≥ 0.5 cm with IM

7/30 (23%)

7 (13%)

23 (7%)

p = 0.15

CLE ≥ 3 cm with IM

3/14 (21%)

3 (6)%

11 (4%)

p = 0.44

  1. CLE columnar epithelium lined lower esophagus (endoscopic diagnosis)
  2. IM intestinal metaplasia (histopathologic diagnosis)