Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of baseline patients’ characteristics, including physical findings and symptoms, between those with perforation and those without perforation by univariate analysis

From: Evaluation of risk factors for perforated peptic ulcer

 

Case subjects (those with perforation)

Control subjects (those without perforation)

p-value

n = 136

n = 272

Physical finding & Symptom

 Location of pain

  Abdominal pain

  

< 0.01

  No pain, n (%)

13 (9.6)

94 (34.6)

 

  Upper abdomen, n (%)

59 (43.4)

82 (30.1)

 

  Mid abdomen, n (%)

9 (6.6)

39 (14.3)

 

  Lower abdomen, n (%)

11 (8.1)

47 (17.3)

 

  Multiple abdomen, n (%)

44 (32.4)

10 (3.7)

 

  Chest pain, n (%)

2 (1.5)

14 (5.1)

0.10

  Back pain, n (%)

15 (11.0)

22 (8.1)

0.36

Other Associated Symptoms

  Loss of appetite, n (%)

33 (24.3)

39 (14.3)

0.02

  Vomiting, n (%)

42 (30.9)

82 (30.1)

0.91

  Nausea, n (%)

51 (37.5)

81 (29.8)

0.12

  Hematemesis, n (%)

10 (7.4)

8 (2.9)

0.07

  Constipation, n (%)

11 (8.1)

16 (5.9)

0.40

  Diarrhea, n (%)

9 (6.6)

49 (18.0)

< 0.01

  Hematochezia/melena, n (%)

24 (17.6)

38 (14.0)

0.38

  Dizziness, n (%)

8 (5.9)

21 (7.7)

0.55

  Perspiration, n (%)

20 (14.7)

34 (12.5)

0.54

  Pallor, n (%)

8 (5.9)

12 (4.4)

0.63

  Respiratory distress, n (%)

9 (6.6)

17 (6.3)

1.00

  Muscular defense, n (%)

93 (68.4)

25 (9.2)

< 0.01

  1. Numbers in bold indicate that the p value is less than 0.05