Skip to main content

Table 3 Subgroup analysis for overall survival

From: The prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio on overall survival in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Factor

Groups

Number of cohorts

HR and 95% CI

P value

Heterogeneity (%)

P value for heterogeneity

P value between subgroups

Study design

Prospective

2

1.05 (0.87–1.27)

0.625

0.0

0.868

0.022

Retrospective

28

1.40 (1.26–1.55)

< 0.001

68.6

< 0.001

Country

China

19

1.32 (1.16–1.49)

< 0.001

75.0

< 0.001

0.045

Japan or Korea

3

1.45 (0.94–2.25)

0.092

71.4

0.030

Other

8

1.51 (1.33–1.72)

< 0.001

0.0

0.503

Sample size

≥ 1000

11

1.25 (1.09–1.45)

0.002

69.2

< 0.001

< 0.001

<  1000

19

1.44 (1.28–1.63)

< 0.001

60.4

< 0.001

Percent male

≥ 70.0

10

1.31 (1.10–1.55)

0.002

72.9

< 0.001

0.014

< 70.0

20

1.40 (1.25–1.58)

< 0.001

63.5

< 0.001

Mean age (years)

≥ 60.0

13

1.41 (1.16–1.71)

0.001

82.2

< 0.001

0.168

< 60.0

12

1.39 (1.23–1.57)

< 0.001

41.6

0.064

Treatment strategy

Surgery

14

1.21 (1.08–1.35)

0.001

56.5

0.005

< 0.001

Chemotherapy

6

1.70 (1.43–2.03)

< 0.001

40.4

0.136

Mixed

10

1.44 (1.31–1.59)

< 0.001

0.0

0.545

Disease status

Early

6

1.18 (1.04–1.34)

0.012

0.0

0.533

0.076

Advanced

13

1.51 (1.26–1.82)

< 0.001

82.0

< 0.001

All

11

1.29 (1.14–1.45)

< 0.001

35.1

0.118

Cutoff value

≥ 200

6

1.79 (1.43–2.24)

< 0.001

56.8

0.041

< 0.001

< 200

24

1.28 (1.17–1.40)

< 0.001

53.9

0.001

NOS scale

High

24

1.34 (1.20–1.50)

< 0.001

72.0

< 0.001

0.039

Low

6

1.49 (1.30–1.72)

< 0.001

0.0

0.416