Skip to main content
Download PDF

Review of recent evidence on the management of heartburn in pregnant and breastfeeding women

BMC Gastroenterology volume 22, Article number: 219 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one the most common medical complaints in pregnant women. Some women continue to experience GERD symptoms after delivery. Effective management of GERD symptoms is important to improve productivity and quality of life. Management of heartburn in pregnant and breastfeeding women involves lifestyle modifications, dietary modifications, non-pharmaceutical remedies and pharmaceutical drugs. For most patients, lifestyle/dietary modifications are helpful in reducing GERD symptoms. For patients who require a more intense intervention, various types of pharmaceutical drugs are available. However, the suitability of each treatment for use during pregnancy and lactation must be taken into consideration. This article explores the reported efficacy and safety of these treatment options in pregnant and breastfeeding women. Recommended treatment algorithm in pregnant and breastfeeding women have been developed.

Peer Review reports

Background

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one the most common medical complaints in pregnant women. Its prevalence has been reported to reach as high as 80% in certain populations [1,2,3]. The prevalence of GERD is also increased as pregnancy progresses from the first to third trimester [4, 5].

Regurgitation, acid taste in mouth and heartburn are among the most common GERD symptoms, with heartburn and regurgitation causing the most significant negative impact [1, 2, 6, 7]. Heartburn during pregnancy may be caused by hormonal changes which affects normal gastric motility, increased intra-abdominal pressure from the growing uterus, slower gastrointestinal transit time or weight gain as pregnancy progresses, leading to acid reflux [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Heartburn and acid reflux have also been shown to be associated with severity of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy [15].

GERD, especially nocturnal GERD, can have a negative impact on productivity and health-related quality of life [1, 6, 16, 17]. Emotion, sleep, eating/drinking, and physical/social functioning are all significantly affected by GERD, although the most significant impact is on sleep [17]. Effective management of GERD symptoms is important to improve quality of life. Treatment is aimed towards alleviating the symptoms caused by the acid reflux. Some guidelines suggest diet/lifestyle modifications and the use of medications to treat GERD symptoms [8, 18]. These include pharmacological agents such as antacids or alkali mixtures, H2 receptor antagonists (H2RA) or proton pump inhibitors (PPI) [8]. However, evidence-based recommendations on use of pharmacological agents during pregnancy and lactation have been lacking [9, 10].

Although GERD symptoms typically resolve following delivery, about 20% of women continue to experience GERD symptoms even after giving birth [19]. As these women may still require medications, it is important to consider the excretion of the medications in breast milk and its potential effect to the nursing infant.

This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of various interventions for relieving heartburn during pregnancy and lactation, based on recent evidence.

Methodology

An electronic search through online databases was conducted for relevant articles published in English between 2009 and 2020. The keywords used for the search engine to obtain relevant papers were: GERD, pregnancy, breastfeeding, lactation, treatment, antacid, alginate, proton pump inhibitor, PPI, histamine-2 receptor antagonist, H2RA, mucosal protectant, potassium-competitive acid blocker, P-CAB, promotility, prokinetic. Potential articles of interest were read through and then selected for inclusion in this review. Bibliographies of relevant articles were also checked to obtain additional articles. Studies of interventions in pregnant and breastfeeding females with GERD symptoms, dyspepsia, reflux, epigastric pain, and hyperemesis gravidarum, were included in this review.

Review outcomes

Non-drug interventions for heartburn relief during pregnancy and lactation

Women with symptoms of heartburn during pregnancy and lactation should first be advised on lifestyle and diet modifications (Table 1) [18]. For women with mild symptoms, a non-pharmacological approach may be all that is required to alleviate symptoms.

Table 1 Recommended lifestyle, dietary and medicine intake modifications for heartburn relief in pregnant and breastfeeding women
Full size table

Non-pharmaceutical management of GERD during pregnancy

Ginger (Zingiber officinale) has frequently been used to treat indigestion, nausea and vomiting. A review on the effects of ginger in pregnancy-induced nausea and vomiting has established ginger as a safe alternative for accelerating gastric emptying and improving nausea and vomiting during pregnancy, although additional controlled studies are needed to confirm these hypotheses [20].

In a prospective hospital-based study, 64 pregnant women in the first trimester were interviewed for symptoms of GERD and dietary details, and followed up until term and delivery. Consumption of green vegetables were found protective against heartburn (relative risk, RR 15; 95% confidence interval, CI 3.52–63.89) and more frequent consumption proportionally decreased the risk of GERD (trend χ2 < 0.001) [21].

A two-phase, randomised, active-controlled, open-label, parallel-group clinical trial was carried out to compare the efficacy of quince fruit extract against ranitidine in 137 pregnant women with GERD symptoms. Ranitidine was prescribed at 150 mg twice daily and quince fruit extract was taken at 10 mg after meals, for a duration of 4 weeks. After 2 weeks, pregnant women taking the quince extract had significantly lower mean General Symptom Score (GSS) score than those receiving ranitidine (p = 0.036). However, the GSS values after 4 weeks were not significantly different between groups (p = 0.074); quince extract was reported to have similar efficacy to ranitidine in the management of GERD during pregnancy [22].

A study reported that pregnant women in Jordan relieve heartburn with remedies such as cold milk, a ‘baking powder’ liquid, herbs, cucumber, lintel seeds, or dry tea leaves. The study participants considered their chosen remedy to be "useful". However, although these strategies may eliminate the need for medications, it cannot be considered non-toxic. Thus, home remedies without scientific basis are preferably avoided during pregnancy [23].

Pharmaceutical management of GERD during pregnancy and lactation

For most patients, lifestyle/dietary modifications are helpful, but may not be entirely sufficient in controlling GERD symptoms. A step-up program with increasing intensification of treatment is commonly utilised for patients with persistent GERD symptoms. The optimum management of GERD in pregnant and breastfeeding women requires consideration of the drugs' safety as well as efficacy, since the medications may affect the foetus/infant [24]. The effect of specific medications on the foetus/infant during pregnancy and lactation are often not well understood, due to ethical limitations against involving pregnant/breastfeeding women in clinical drug trials. Even so, based on animal studies and/or population-based studies involving pregnant women, certain medications appear to be safe for use in pregnancy. These medications may be a helpful alternative if lifestyle modifications do not adequately relieve symptoms [14].

GERD during pregnancy is known to predispose patients to postpartum GERD [25,26,27]. This may necessitate the need to continue GERD symptom management even after delivery (into the breastfeeding period). However, data on the use of medications for GERD while breastfeeding are limited [28]. Medications with minimal systemic absorption are preferred for breastfeeding patients [28].

Antacids

Antacids are commonly used for the treatment of GERD during pregnancy. Its key ingredient consists of various salts of calcium, magnesium and aluminium. Its mechanism of action is by neutralising the stomach acid and by inhibiting pepsin [29]. Antacids are considered as non-systemic therapy, and thus are a favourable first line therapy to manage GERD during pregnancy [12].

However, because gastric acidity is essential for the absorption of certain minerals (e.g. calcium, iron, magnesium) and vitamin B12, antacids should be used with caution in pregnant patients with deficiencies [11, 24, 30]. Antacids should also not be taken within two hours of iron and folic acid supplements [31].

Antacids containing aluminium salts are considered safe for use in pregnant women. Long-term intake of antacids containing magnesium trisilicate have been associated with cardiovascular problems, respiratory issues, hypotonia, and kidney stone formation. Sodium bicarbonate antacids are preferably avoided during pregnancy, as they may lead to fluid overload and metabolic alkalosis in the mother and foetus [12].

Excessive use of calcium-containing antacids (> 1000 mg elemental calcium/day) is to be avoided in pregnant women, as calcium may cross the placenta [29, 32]. It may also lead to calcium-alkali syndrome, characterised by hypercalcaemia, metabolic alkalosis, and renal impairment [32, 33]. Dehydration due to vomiting can make hypercalcemia and alkalosis potentially life-threatening [32, 33]. Events involving hypercalcaemia may occur with self-administration of over-the-counter medications. Pregnant women with GERD symptoms must receive guidance to prevent potential overdose [34, 35].

Data on use of antacids when breastfeeding are lacking, although antacid use during breastfeeding is considered generally acceptable. Aluminium, calcium, or magnesium are poorly absorbed orally. Furthermore, magnesium and calcium are usual constituents of breast milk, and breast milk has lower levels of aluminium than cow’s milk and infant formula [29, 36, 37].

Alginates

Alginates are natural polysaccharide polymers which polymerise into a gel upon contact with gastric acid [38]. Alginate formulations for GERD treatment are frequently combined with antacids such as sodium bicarbonate. The sodium bicarbonate component in the alginate formulation releases carbon dioxide within the alginate gel; this causes the gel to float to the top of the stomach contents to form a raft structure [38]. The alginate-antacid raft forms a non-systemic barrier over the postprandial acid pocket to reduce postprandial acid reflux (Fig. 1) [38]. In an alginate/antacid combination, the rapid antacid action works concurrently with the long-lasting alginate reflux suppression [39].

Fig. 1
figure 1

Adapted from Bor et al. [79]

Diagram of alginate raft structure formation following ingestion of an alginate-containing formulation. Alginates react with the stomach acid to form a gel-like substance with neutral pH (A). Sodium bicarbonate contained in the formulation releases carbon dioxide gas, which becomes trapped in the gel. The trapped carbon dioxide gas allows the gel to float to the surface of the stomach content (B), effectively forming a raft structure (C) which acts as a barrier over the gastric acid pocket, and blocks against upward reflux.

Full size image

A double-blinded, randomised, controlled trial to compare the efficacy of an alginate-based reflux suppressant, Liquid Gaviscon® (Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Ltd, Hull, UK; Liquid Gaviscon® contains 500 mg sodium alginate, 267 mg sodium bicarbonate and 160 mg calcium carbonate per 10 mL) vs. a magnesium–aluminium antacid gel (Maalox® Olic (Thailand) Co., Ltd., Thailand; 5 mL contains 120 mg magnesium hydroxide and 220 mg aluminium hydroxide) in 100 pregnant women at < 36 weeks' gestation who had ≥ 2 episodes of heartburn a week. The treatment dose was 15 mL orally three times after meal and before bedtime, continued for 2 weeks. Both treatments similarly improved heartburn frequency (80% vs. 88%, p = 0.275) and heartburn intensity (92% vs. 92%, p = 1.000). Alginate-based reflux suppressant was shown no different from magnesium–aluminium antacid gel in the treatment of heartburn in pregnancy [40].

A multicentre, prospective, open-label study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Liquid Gaviscon® in pregnant women (≤ 38 weeks' gestation) with heartburn and/or reflux was conducted. Treatment was at a dose of 10–20 mL as required to relieve symptoms, to a maximum of 80 mL per day, for 4 weeks. The investigators considered the treatment a success in 91% of patients (95% CI 85.0–95.3), and 90% (95% CI 84.1–94.8) when self-assessed by the patient. Adverse events were very few in this study. Liquid Gaviscon® was shown to not impact the serum sodium levels during pregnancy; this is important as hypertension, pre-eclampsia, and oedema are all significant complications during pregnancy [26].

An open-label, multicentre, phase IV study investigated the efficacy and safety of an alginate-based reflux suppressant containing potassium bicarbonate (Gaviscon Advance®; Reckitt Benckiser Healthcare (UK) Ltd, Hull, UK) with a significantly lower sodium content per dose vs. conventional alginate formulations in the treatment of heartburn during pregnancy. A total of 150 pregnant women before or at 38 weeks' gestation took 5–10 mL of Gaviscon Advance® (up to 40 mL/day), as required, for 4 weeks. At the end of the study, the investigators and women rated the efficacy of treatment as "very good"/"good" in 88% and 90% of women, respectively. Over half of the women experienced symptom relief within 10 min. Most adverse events reported by women in this study were considered related to the pregnancy, and not related to the study medication. In addition, the incidence of adverse events affecting the foetus/baby was low and consistent with expected incidences, and none was considered related to the study medication. The maternal mean sodium or potassium serum concentrations saw minimal change after 4 weeks of treatment [41].

Maternal alginate absorption is limited and alginates are not significantly metabolised. Thus, alginates are considered acceptable for use during lactation [36, 37]. Its mode of action and long-term experience with its use indicate that they are safe to use in high-risk pregnancies and breastfeeding populations [26].

Histamine-2 receptor antagonist (H2RA)

H2RAs are the most commonly used medication in pregnant women for the treatment of GERD symptoms which failed to respond to antacids. H2RAs act by competitively inhibiting histamine at H2 receptors of the parietal cells in the stomach, which results in gastric acid secretion inhibition [19, 42]. H2RAs which have previously been used for GERD symptom alleviation during pregnancy include cimetidine, ranitidine, famotidine and nizatidine [19].

A meta-analysis performed to determine the foetal safety of H2RA use during pregnancy compared 2398 pregnant women who received H2RAs in at least the first trimester against 119,892 women in the control group. The meta-analysis revealed no increased risk for congenital malformation, spontaneous abortion, preterm birth, and small for gestational age infants vs. the control group [43].

Different H2RAs are excreted in breast milk at lower amounts than the doses administered to infants. H2RAs are also known to stimulate prolactin secretion, although the impact of such a secretion in nursing mothers is not known [36].

Cimetidine is excreted into breast milk in largest amounts among H2RAs, with a dose-normalised peak level at 2.5–3.1 mg/L for each 100 mg of cimetidine [36, 44]. Ranitidine and nizatidine are both excreted in small amounts in milk; ranitidine concentration peaks at 2.6 mg/L 5.5 h after a 150 mg dose, whereas nizatidine concentration peaks at 1.2 mg/L about 2 h after a 150 mg dose [36, 45, 46]. However, animal toxicology studies have suggested that nizatidine may be unsuitable for use during breastfeeding [36]. It is important to note that the US FDA has issued statement to withdraw all ranitidine products from the market, due to the possible higher-than-safe levels of a carcinogenic contaminant, NDMA, in ranitidine products [47].@@@ Famotidine, on the other hand, is least excreted into breast milk (concentration in breast milk at 53 and 55 µg/L at 3 and 6 h after a 10/20 mg dose, respectively), and is the longest acting between the H2RAs [48]. Famotidine may be the preferred H2RA to use during lactation [36].

Mucosal protectant

Sucralfate is a mucosal protectant which adheres to the epithelial cells, creating a physical barrier against the acidic environment [42, 49]. When taken at 1 g thrice daily, it has been shown effective in managing GERD symptoms without adverse maternal or foetal events [12]. As sucralfate is minimally-absorbed, it is considered safe for use in pregnancy [37].

Sucralfate use during lactation has not been studied, although it is likely safe due to limited maternal absorption [24].

PPI

In the acidic environment, PPIs irreversibly bind to the H+/K+-ATPase to prevent gastric acid production [19, 50]. However, PPI-induced gastric acid inhibition has a delayed onset [19, 51]. Many patients with GERD symptoms report dissatisfaction with PPI treatment [50, 51].

Although most PPIs have been classified as category B drug in pregnancy, PPI use in pregnancy is reserved to those with GERD complications or those with symptoms not responding to other therapies [12]. Omeprazole is classified as a category C drug, due to risk shown in animal studies [12].

Although there are potential adverse effects which have been associated with long-term PPI use includes kidney disease, dementia, bone fracture, myocardial infarction, infections, micronutrient deficiencies, and gastrointestinal malignancies, the strength of evidence connecting these adverse effects to PPIs is low; therefore, the connection between long-term PPI use with these possible adverse events are inconclusive [30]. However, PPI therapy causes increased gastric pH, which may deplete the protective barrier function against ingested pathogens and increase vulnerability to enteric infections [7, 52].

In a cohort study involving 6051 nulliparous women, PPI use anytime during pregnancy increased the risk of overall preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio, aOR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04–1.32) and preeclampsia at term (aOR 1.20; 95% CI 1.04–1.39). However, use of PPI after 28 gestational weeks reduced the risk of preterm (delivery < 37 weeks) preeclampsia (aOR 0.63; 95% CI 0.41–0.96) and early (delivery < 34 weeks) preeclampsia (aOR 0.41; 95% CI 0.20–0.82). The authors report that the findings may be due to heterogeneity of preeclampsia, with PPIs potentially preventing preterm preeclampsia when taken near preeclampsia onset [53].

In a cohort study involving 840,968 live births to study the association between PPI use during pregnancy and the risk of major birth defects, 5082 births were determined to have PPI exposure between 4 weeks prior to conception and the end of the first trimester. Major birth defects were reported in 3.4% of infants of exposed mothers, compared to 2.6% of infants of unexposed mothers (adjusted prevalence odds ratio: 1.23; 95% CI 1.05–1.44). Among 3651 infants with exposure limited to the first trimester, major birth defects were reported in 3.2% of the infants (adjusted prevalence odds ratio: 1.10; 95% CI 0.91–1.34). Lansoprazole intake within 4 weeks prior to conception was significantly associated with an increased risk of birth defects. However, the risk of birth defects was not significantly increased with individual PPI use during the first trimester. Interestingly, omeprazole was the most commonly prescribed PPI in this study [54].

A meta-analysis of 7 studies reported no significant risk of birth defects with PPI use in the first trimester. Using data from 1530 PPI-exposed and 133,410 PPI-unexposed subjects, the overall OR for major malformations was 1.12 (95% CI 0.86–1.45). No increased risk for spontaneous abortions (OR 1.29; 95% CI 0.84–1.97) and preterm delivery (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.96–1.33) were observed. A secondary analysis of 1341 omeprazole-exposed and 120,137 omeprazole-unexposed subjects revealed an OR for major malformations of 1.17 (95% CI 0.90–1.53). The results suggested that PPIs are not associated with an increased risk of major congenital birth defects, spontaneous abortions, or preterm births [55].

PPI excretion into breast milk is minimal; furthermore, stomach acid degrades PPIs. Therefore, PPIs may be broken down in the infant’s stomach. In addition, similar to H2RAs, PPIs may also raise serum prolactin [36].

In a study involving 12 mothers taking pantoprazole, pantoprazole was undetectable in the breast milk approximately 80% of the time. The concentration of pantoprazole in breast milk after 7 days of therapy was only 150 ng/L on average [56]. A nursing woman who ingested of 40 mg of pantoprazole was observed to excrete pantoprazole in her breast milk. The infant's intake of pantoprazole through breast milk was estimated at 7.3 µg, or 0.14% of the weight-normalised dose received by the mother. However, the infant was expected to absorb even lower amounts than this, as the pantoprazole would have been exposed to the infant's stomach acid [57].

Pantoprazole and omeprazole are both excreted into breast milk at 300–600 times lower amounts than doses given to infants [36]. This may be true for esomeprazole as well, being the single-isomer form of omeprazole. However, esomeprazole strontium is not preferable, as strontium is absorbed into the bone [36].

Data on lansoprazole use during breastfeeding is limited. As lansoprazole is safe for use in infants, it can be postulated that the amount of lansoprazole excreted in breast milk may be safe. Furthermore, the R-enantiomer of lansoprazole, dexlansoprazole, is assumed to also be safe [37].

The effect of rabeprazole use during breastfeeding is not available. Alternate drugs are recommended when nursing infants [37].

Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CAB)

P-CABs reversibly inhibit gastric H+/K+-ATPase by competitive interaction with the K+ site of the enzyme. P-CABs are absorbed rapidly and reach high plasma concentrations, and have a faster onset of action than conventional PPIs [42, 50]. However, in some classes of P-CABs, the binding to H+/K+-ATPase is quickly reversed, which may cause reduced efficacy [51].

The P-CAB known as vonoprazan has been in approved in Japan for erosive oesophagitis, gastric and duodenal ulcer, GERD, and Helicobacter pylori eradication [51]. However, to date, there is yet a clinical study conducted to evaluate the use of vonoprazan in pregnant women [58]. In a rat toxicology study, embryo-foetal toxicity was observed following exposure of > 28 times the maximum clinical dose (40 mg/day) of vonoprazan. Vonoprazan should not be prescribed to pregnant women, unless the expected therapeutic benefit is thought to outweigh any possible risk [58].

It is unknown whether vonoprazan is excreted in breast milk, although animal studies have shown that vonoprazan was excreted in milk. Breastfeeding should be avoided if taking vonoprazan [58].

Promotility drugs

Promotility drugs enhances gastric emptying, which reduces the time that the acid pocket sits in the stomach. Metoclopramide is one such promotility agent; it promotes gastrointestinal motility and gastric emptying, and increases LOS pressure [12, 59].

A retrospective cohort study analysed the safety of metoclopramide use during the first trimester of pregnancy in 3458 exposed infants. Metoclopramide was found not associated with adverse outcomes, which include major congenital malformations, low birth weight, preterm birth, and perinatal death [60].

The amount of metoclopramide excreted in breast milk may vary. Most infants will receive < 10% of the maternal weight-adjusted doses, although some infants may receive pharmacologically active doses [37]. No side effect was observed in infants whose mothers take 45 mg/day [28]. No adverse effects have been reported in breastfed infants with metoclopramide [37].

It is important to note the US FDA has issued a black box warning for metoclopramide due to reports of tardive dyskinesia with high-dose, long-term use [61]. Metoclopramide has also been shown to increase QT/RR slope and QT variance, thus caution is needed if considering for long-term use [62].

Association of prenatal exposure to acid suppressors with childhood asthma and allergic disease

Several studies have shown that exposure to acid suppressors during gestation may be associated to childhood asthma, although maternal asthma was potentially a main confounder [63].

Mulder et al. identified three studies which reported an association between prenatal exposure to acid-suppressive drugs (ASDs) and childhood asthma. ASDs exposure increased the odds of asthma in toddlers by 85% (OR 1.85; 95% CI 1.07–3.19). Exposure to over 14 defined daily doses of any ASD increased the odds of asthma in toddlers by 156% (OR 2.56; 95% CI 1.18–5.52) [64].

A study involving 685,015 singleton children born between 1999 and 2007 in Sweden was carried out to investigate the relationship between maternal use of various drug types and the risk of childhood asthma. Drugs for GERD may be associated with childhood asthma (aOR 1.32; 95% CI 1.18–1.54), although further studies are required to verify the association [65].

A systematic review and meta-analysis associated ASD exposure during pregnancy with the risk of childhood asthma (RR 1.45; 95% CI 1.35–1.56; I2 = 0%; p < 0.00001). The overall risk of childhood asthma was increased with PPI use (RR 1.34; 95% CI 1.18–1.52; I2 = 46%; p < 0.00001) and H2RA use (RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.46–1.69; I2 = 0%; p < 0.00001). However, maternal asthma may be a main confounder in the selected studies. In addition, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for pre-existing GERD and GERD diagnosed during pregnancy were 1.07 (95% CI 0.79–1.44) and 1.17 (95% CI 0.92–1.48), respectively. This possibly supports GERD as a risk factor for childhood asthma. The study recommends caution when interpreting the link between prenatal exposure to ASDs and childhood asthma [66].

In a cohort study involving 33 536 children followed-up for a maximum of 8 years, the aHR for any allergic disease in children exposed to PPIs or H2RAs was 1.37 (95% CI 1.14–1.66). PPIs and/or H2RAs exposure during pregnancy was associated with atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis (aHRs: 1.32 [95% CI 1.06–1.64], 1.57 [95% CI 1.20–2.05] and 2.40 [95% CI 1.42–4.04], respectively). The risk for the development of ≥ 2 and 3 allergic diseases were also increased (aHRs: 2.13 [95% CI 1.43–3.19] and 5.18 [95% CI 2.16–12.42], respectively). PPI and H2RA intake during pregnancy may lead to an increased risk of atopic dermatitis, asthma and allergic rhinitis, and the development of multiple allergic diseases [67].

Recommended treatment algorithm for pregnant and breastfeeding women

The safety of various GERD therapies during pregnancy and lactation are summarised in Table 2. The recommended treatment algorithm to alleviate symptoms of GERD in pregnant and breastfeeding women are shown in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively.

Table 2 Safety of GERD therapies during pregnancy and lactation
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Adapted from Ali and Egan [24]. GERD gastroesophageal reflux disease, OGD oesophagogastroduodenoscopy, P-CAB potassium-competitive acid blockers

Preferred treatment algorithm for GERD during pregnancy, according to current evidence. Mild GERD is usually remedied by non-pharmaceutical interventions (step 1). In all patients, if symptoms persist after step 1, patients may proceed to step 2, and so on. Once symptoms are resolved, advise patients to continue non-pharmaceutical intervention.

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Adapted from Ali and Egan [24]. GERD gastroesophageal reflux disease, OGD oesophagogastroduodenoscopy

Preferred treatment algorithm for GERD during lactation, according to current evidence. Mild GERD is usually remedied by non-pharmaceutical interventions (step 1). In all patients, if symptoms persist after step 1, patients may proceed to step 2, and so on. Once symptoms are resolved, advise patients to continue non-pharmaceutical intervention.

Full size image

Conclusions

Management of heartburn in pregnant and breastfeeding women involves lifestyle or dietary modifications, non-pharmaceutical remedies and pharmaceutical drugs. For most patients, lifestyle/dietary modifications are helpful in reducing GERD symptoms. Alginate/antacid combinations may be also considered for its capacity to develop a non-systemic mechanical barrier above the postprandial acid pocket in the stomach [38]. Patients who require more intense intervention may be offered pharmaceutical drugs. However, the suitability of each treatment for use during pregnancy and lactation must be taken into consideration.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

aHR:

Adjusted hazard ratios

aOR:

Adjusted odds ratio

ASD:

Acid-suppressive drug

BMI:

Body mass index

GERD:

Gastroesophageal reflux disease

GSS:

General Symptom Score

H2RA:

H2 receptor antagonist

LOS:

Lower oesophageal sphincter

OR:

Odds ratio

P-CAB:

Potassium-competitive acid blocker

PPI:

Proton pump inhibitors

RR:

Relative risk

TLOSR:

Transient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation

References

  1. Malfertheiner SF, Malfertheiner MV, Mönkemüller K, Röhl FW, Malfertheiner P, Costa SD. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and management in advanced pregnancy: a prospective survey. Digestion. 2009;79(2):115–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramu B, Mohan P, Rajasekaran MS, Jayanthi V. Prevalence and risk factors for gastroesophageal reflux in pregnancy. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2011;30(3):144–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bassey OO. Pregnancy heartburn in Nigerians and Caucasians with theories about aetiology based on manometric recordings from the oesophagus and stomach. BJOG. 1977;84(6):439–43.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Malfertheiner SF, Malfertheiner MV, Kropf S, Costa SD, Malfertheiner P. A prospective longitudinal cohort study: evolution of GERD symptoms during the course of pregnancy. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12(1):131.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Malfertheiner M, Malfertheiner P, Costa SD, Pfeifer M, Ernst W, Seelbach-Göbel B, et al. Extraesophageal symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease during pregnancy. Z Gastroenterol. 2015;53(09):1080–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dall’Alba V, Callegari-Jacques SM, Krahe C, Bruch JP, Alves BC, Barros SG. Health-related quality of life of pregnant women with heartburn and regurgitation. Arq Gastroenterol. 2015;52(2):100–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. MacFarlane B. Management of gastroesophageal reflux disease in adults: a pharmacist’s perspective. Integr Pharm Res Pract. 2018;7:41–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health. Antenatal care routine care for the healthy pregnant woman. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62/evidence/full-guideline-pdf-196748323. Accessed 24 April 2020.

  9. Phupong V, Hanprasertpong T. Interventions for heartburn in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;9:CD011379.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Van Der Woude CJ, Metselaar HJ, Danese S. Management of gastrointestinal and liver diseases during pregnancy. Gut. 2014;63(6):1014–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gomes CF, Sousa M, Lourenço I, Martins D, Torres J. Gastrointestinal diseases during pregnancy: what does the gastroenterologist need to know? Ann Gastroenterol. 2018;31(4):385–94.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Body C, Christie JA. Gastrointestinal diseases in pregnancy: nausea, vomiting, hyperemesis gravidarum, gastroesophageal reflux disease, constipation, and diarrhea. Gastroenterol Clin N Am. 2016;45(2):267–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clark SM, Dutta E, Hankins GD. The outpatient management and special considerations of nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. Semin Perinatol. 2014;38(8):496–502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zielinski R, Searing K, Deibel M. Gastrointestinal distress in pregnancy. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2015;29(1):23–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gill SK, Maltepe C, Koren G. The effect of heartburn and acid reflux on the severity of nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;23(4):270–2.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gerson LB, Fass R. A systematic review of the definitions, prevalence, and response to treatment of nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;7(4):372–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Malfertheiner SF, Seelbach-Göbel B, Costa SD, Ernst W, Reuschel E, Zeman F, et al. Impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms on the quality of life in pregnant women: a prospective study. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;29(8):892–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. NICE. Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62/resources/antenatal-care-for-uncomplicated-pregnancies-pdf-975564597445. Accessed 24 April 2020.

  19. Jacobs JW, Richter JE. Role of H2RA and proton pump inhibitor therapy in treating reflux disease. In: Vaezi MF, editor. Diagnosis and treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Cham: Springer; 2016. p. 71–91.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Giacosa A, Morazzoni P, Bombardelli E, Riva A, Bianchi Porro G, Rondanelli M. Can nausea and vomiting be treated with ginger extract. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(7):1291–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ramya RS, Jayanthi N, Alexander PC, Vijaya S, Jayanthi V. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in pregnancy: a longitudinal study. Trop Gastroenterol. 2015;35(3):168–72.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Shakeri A, Hashempur MH, Mojibian M, Aliasl F, Bioos S, Nejatbakhsh F. A comparative study of ranitidine and quince (Cydonia oblonga mill) sauce on gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in pregnancy: a randomised, open-label, active-controlled clinical trial. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;38(7):899–905.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Khresheh R. Strategies used by Jordanian women to alleviate heartburn during pregnancy. Midwifery. 2011;27(5):603–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ali RA, Egan LJ. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2007;21(5):793–806.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Naumann CR, Zelig C, Napolitano PG, Ko CW. Nausea, vomiting, and heartburn in pregnancy: a prospective look at risk, treatment, and outcome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25(8):1488–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Strugala V, Bassin J, Swales VS, Lindow SW, Dettmar PW, Thomas E. Assessment of the safety and efficacy of a raft-forming alginate reflux suppressant (Liquid Gaviscon) for the treatment of heartburn during pregnancy. ISRN Obstet Gynecol. 2012;2012:481870.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Bor S, Kitapcioglu G, Dettmar P, Baxter T. Association of heartburn during pregnancy with the risk of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;5(9):1035–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dagli U, Kalkan IH. Treatment of reflux disease during pregnancy and lactation. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2017;28(Suppl 1):S53–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Singh P, Salisbury BH, Terrell JM. Antacids. Treasure Island: StatPearls Publishing; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Freedberg DE, Kim LS, Yang YX. The risks and benefits of long-term use of proton pump inhibitors: expert review and best practice advice from the American Gastroenterological Association. Gastroenterology. 2017;152(4):706–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. World Health Organization. WHO recommendation on interventions for the relief of heartburn during pregnancy. https://extranet.who.int/rhl/topics/preconception-pregnancy-childbirth-and-postpartum-care/antenatal-care/general-antenatal-care/who-recommendation-interventions-relief-heartburn-during-pregnancy. Accessed 2 May 2020.

  32. D’Souza R, Gandhi S, Fortinsky KJ, Silverman M, Cohen-Lyons D, Czikk M, et al. Calcium carbonate intoxication in pregnancy: the return of the milk-alkali syndrome. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(11):976–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kolnick L, Harris BD, Choma DP, Choma NN. Hypercalcemia in pregnancy: a case of milk-alkali syndrome. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(8):939–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Thornton MD, Chen L, Langhan ML. Neonatal seizures: soothing a burning topic. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2013;29(10):1107–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Trezevant MS, Winton JC, Holmes AK. Hypercalcemia-induced pancreatitis in pregnancy following calcium carbonate ingestion. J Pharm Pract. 2019;32(2):225–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Anderson PO. Treating gastroesophageal reflux and heartburn while breastfeeding. Breastfeed Med. 2018;13(7):463–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Thélin CS, Richter JE. the management of heartburn during pregnancy and lactation. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2020;51(4):421–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rohof WO, Bennink RJ, Smout AJ, Thomas E, Boeckxstaens GE. An alginate-antacid formulation localizes to the acid pocket to reduce acid reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11(12):1585–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Hampson FC, Jolliffe IG, Bakhtyari A, Taylor G, Sykes J, Johnstone LM, et al. Alginate–antacid combinations: raft formation and gastric retention studies. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2010;36(5):614–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Meteerattanapipat P, Phupong V. Efficacy of alginate-based reflux suppressant and magnesium–aluminium antacid gel for treatment of heartburn in pregnancy: a randomized double-blind controlled trial. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44830.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Lindow SW, Regnell P, Sykes J, Little S. An open-label, multicentre study to assess the safety and efficacy of a novel reflux suppressant (Gaviscon Advance) in the treatment of heartburn during pregnancy. Int J Clin Pract. 2003;57(3):175–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang YK, Hsu WH, Wang SS, Lu CY, Kuo FC, Su YC, et al. Current pharmacological management of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2013;2013:983653.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Gill SK, O’Brien L, Koren G. The safety of histamine 2 (H2) blockers in pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54(9):1835–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Oo CY, Kuhn RJ, Desai N, McNamara PJ. Active transport of cimetidine into human milk. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1995;58(5):548–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Drugs and Lactation Database (LactMed) [Internet]. Ranitidine. [Updated 2020 Sep 21]. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine (US). 2006. https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/books/NBK501252/. Accessed 15 Mar 2022.

  46. Obermeyer BD, Bergstrom RF, Callaghan JT, Knadler MP, Golichowski A, Rubin A. Secretion of nizatidine into human breast milk after single and multiple doses. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1990;47(6):724–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. US Food and Drug Administration. FDA requests removal of all ranitidine products (Zantac) from the market. https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-requests-removal-all-ranitidine-products-zantac-market. Accessed 2 May 2020.

  48. Wang X, Zhan Y, Hankins GD, Ahmed MS, Rytting E, Patrikeeva S, et al. Pharmacokinetics of famotidine in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011;204(1):S72–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Singh P, Singh N, Palit G. Current scenario of pharmacological approaches for gastroesophageal reflux disease. Pharmacologia. 2012;3:275–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Luo HJ, Deng WQ, Zou K. Protonated form: the potent form of potassium-competitive acid blockers. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(5):e97688.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Garnock-Jones KP. Vonoprazan: first global approval. Drugs. 2015;75(4):439–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Bavishi C, Dupont HL. Systematic review: the use of proton pump inhibitors and increased susceptibility to enteric infection. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34(11–12):1269–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Hastie R, Bergman L, Cluver CA, Wikman A, Hannan NJ, Walker SP, et al. Proton pump inhibitors and preeclampsia risk among 157 720 women: a Swedish population register–based cohort study. Hypertension. 2019;73(5):1097–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Pasternak B, Hviid A. Use of proton-pump inhibitors in early pregnancy and the risk of birth defects. New Engl J Med. 2010;363(22):2114–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Gill SK, O’brien L, Einarson TR, Koren G. The safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104(6):1541–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Bor S, Karacaoglu S, Ergun P, Kipcak S, Turkyilmaz G, Karasulu E. The levels of pantoprazole in human breast milk and plasma: two compartment model. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;29:79–80.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Majithia R, Johnson DA. Are proton pump inhibitors safe during pregnancy and lactation? Drugs. 2012;72(2):171–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. MIMS Malaysia. Vocinti (vonoprazan) full prescribing information, dosage & side effects. https://www.mims.com/malaysia/drug/info/vocinti?type=full. Accessed 2 May 2020.

  59. Mikami H, Ishimura N, Fukazawa K, Okada M, Izumi D, Shimura S, et al. Effects of metoclopramide on esophageal motor activity and esophagogastric junction compliance in healthy volunteers. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016;22(1):112–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  60. Matok I, Gorodischer R, Koren G, Sheiner E, Wiznitzer A, Levy A. The safety of metoclopramide use in the first trimester of pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(24):2528–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. US FDA. Reglan® tablets. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2011/017854s058lbl.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2020.

  62. Ellidokuz EN, Kaya D. The effect of metoclopramide on QT dynamicity: double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study in healthy male volunteers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18(1):151–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Andersen AB, Erichsen R, Farkas DK, Mehnert F, Ehrenstein V, Sørensen HT. Prenatal exposure to acid-suppressive drugs and the risk of childhood asthma: a population-based Danish cohort study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;35(10):1190–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Mulder B, Schuiling-Veninga CC, Bos JH, de Vries TW, Hak E. Acid-suppressive drug use in pregnancy and the toddler’s asthma risk: a crossover, case-control study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2013;132(6):1438–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Källén B, Finnström O, Nygren KG, Otterblad OP. Maternal drug use during pregnancy and asthma risk among children. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2013;24(1):28–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Lai T, Wu M, Liu J, Luo M, He L, Wang X, et al. Acid-suppressive drug use during pregnancy and the risk of childhood asthma: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics. 2018;141(2):e20170889.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Mulder B, Schuiling-Veninga CC, Bos HJ, De Vries TW, Jick SS, Hak E. Prenatal exposure to acid-suppressive drugs and the risk of allergic diseases in the offspring: a cohort study. Clin Exp Allergy. 2014;44(2):261–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Fujiwara Y, Machida A, Watanabe Y, Shiba M, Tominaga K, Watanabe T, et al. Association between dinner-to-bed time and gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;100(12):2633–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Allampati S, Lopez R, Thota PN, Ray M, Birgisson S, Gabbard SL. Use of a positional therapy device significantly improves nocturnal gastroesophageal reflux symptoms. Dis Esophagus. 2017;30(3):1–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Person E, Rife C, Freeman J, Clark A, Castell DO. A novel sleep positioning device reduces gastroesophageal reflux. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015;49(8):655–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Ness-Jensen E, Lagergren J. Tobacco smoking, alcohol consumption and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2017;31(5):501–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Tytgat GN, Heading RC, Müller-Lissner S, Kamm MA, Schoelmerich J, Berstad A, et al. Contemporary understanding and management of reflux and constipation in the general population and pregnancy: a consensus meeting. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2003;18(3):291–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Moazzez R, Bartlett D, Anggiansah A. The effect of chewing sugar-free gum on gastro-esophageal reflux. J Dent Res. 2005;84(11):1062–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kaufman SE, Kaye MD. Induction of gastro-oesophageal reflux by alcohol. Gut. 1978;19(4):336–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Rodriguez S, Miner P, Robinson M, Greenwood B, Maton PN, Pappa K. Meal type affects heartburn severity. Dig Dis Sci. 1998;43(3):485–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Price SF, Smithson KW, Castell DO. Food sensitivity in reflux oesophagitis. In: Duthie HL, editor. Gastrointestinal motility in health and disease. Dordrecht: Springer; 1978. p. 441–7.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  77. Pehl C, Pfeiffer A, Wendl B, Kaess H. The effect of decaffeination of coffee on gastro-oesophageal reflux in patients with reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997;11(3):483–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Richter JE. The management of heartburn in pregnancy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2005;22(9):749–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Bor S, Kalkan İH, Çelebi A, Dinçer D, Akyüz F, Dettmar P, et al. Alginates: from the ocean to gastroesophageal reflux disease treatment. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2019;30(Suppl 2):S109.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Editorial assistance for this article is provided by MediConnexions Consulting Pte Ltd.

Funding

The development of this article was funded by Reckitt Malaysia. Reckitt Malaysia plays no role in the design and writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Raja Affendi Raja Ali

  2. GUT Research Group, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

    Raja Affendi Raja Ali

  3. Faculty of Medicine and Hospital, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia

    Jamiyah Hassan

  4. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Galway University Hospital, The National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

    Laurence J. Egan

Authors
  1. Raja Affendi Raja Ali
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jamiyah Hassan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Laurence J. Egan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

RARA, JH and LJE reviewed, provided input and approved the final draft. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raja Affendi Raja Ali.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

J.H. has received honoraria as speaker fee from Sanofi, Abbott Pharmaceutical, Johnson & Johnson, Menarini, Bayer, Merck Sharpe and Dohme, Zuellig Pharma and Toshiba Medical. R.A.R.A. and L.J.E. declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ali, R.A.R., Hassan, J. & Egan, L.J. Review of recent evidence on the management of heartburn in pregnant and breastfeeding women. BMC Gastroenterol 22, 219 (2022). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12876-022-02287-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12876-022-02287-w

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us