Skip to main content

Table 3 Risk of GORD among hormone replacement users: multiple regression

From: Hormone replacement therapy is associated with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a retrospective cohort study

 

Oestrogen-only users No. of GORD cases OR (95% CI) P

Tibolone users No. of GORD cases OR (95% CI) P

Combined HRT users No. of GORD cases OR (95% CI) P

Progestogen users No. of GORD cases OR (95% CI) P

GORD

Hormone

144

21

137

56

Non-hormone

572

572

572

572

OR (95% CI) p

1.49 (1.18–1.89) 0.001

0.79 (0.45–1.4) 0.419

1.09 (0.87–1.37) 0.445

1.29 (0.90–1.84) 0.170

NSAIDs <30d

Hormone

23

3

22

12

Non-hormone

99

99

99

99

OR (95% CI) p

1.52 (1.09–2.12) 0.014

1.08 (0.48–2.48) 0.848

1.25 (0.92–1.71) 0.150

1.09 (0.68–1.74) 0.718

NSAIDs ≥30d

Hormone

75

14

62

21

Non-hormone

233

233

233

233

OR (95% CI) p

2.06 (1.59–2.66) < 0.001

3.42 (1.22–9.64) 0.020

1.97 (1.56–2.50) < 0.000

1.14 (0.77–1.68) 0.520

Calcium <30d

Hormone

1

0

0

0

Non-hormone

10

10

10

10

OR (95% CI) p

0.56 (0.13–2.41) 0.439

1.58 (0.31–8.02) 0.582

0.49 (0.11–2.06) 0.325

4.14 (1.40–12.27) 0.010

Calcium ≥30d

Hormone

11

2

11

0

Non-hormone

37

37

37

37

OR (95% CI) p

2.15 (1.26–3.66) 0.005

1.88 (0.53–6.72) 0.330

1.99 (1.18–3.36) 0.010

1.64 (0.523–5.07) 0.393

Bisphosphonate <30d

Hormone

0

0

1

0

Non-hormone

3

3

3

3

OR (95% CI) p

0.56 (0.06–4.80) 0.592

- (−) 0.999

1.11 (0.29–4.26) 0.886

- (−) 0.999

Bisphosphonate ≥30d

Hormone

6

0

4

0

Non-hormone

12

12

12

12

OR (95% CI) p

0.93 (0.43–2.04) 0.865

0.84 (0.15–4.75) 0.845

0.69 (0.27–1.79) 0.445

0.75 (0.13–4.27) 0.744

  1. This table shows the number of prospective GORD positive events for hormone replacement use and non-use.