Table 2 Pair-wise and network estimates of the effects of different treatments compared with CST on mortality and MODS rate
From: Minimally invasive drainage versus open surgical debridement in SAP/SMAP – a network meta-analysis
Comparisons | Risk Ratio (95% CI) | Risk Ratio (95% CrI) | P for inconsistencya | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pair-wise meta-analysis | I2 | Network meta-analysis | I2 | |||
Mortality | ||||||
Comparison 1 | ||||||
MID | 6 | 0.50 (0.21, 0.81) | 19.9% | 0.36 (0.16, 0.64) | 24.1% | – |
OSD | 1 | 0.95 (0.60, 1.52) | 0.0% | 0.56 (0.22, 1.30) | 0.0% | 0.605 |
Comparison 2 | ||||||
EMID | 4 | 0.53 (0.32, 0.88) | 0.0% | 0.43 (0.21, 0.78) | 0.0% | 0.598 |
LMID | 2 | 0.25 (0.03, 2.22) | 66.2% | 0.19 (0.06, 0.47) | 24.4% | 0.842 |
EOSD | 0 | – | – | 0.55 (0.12, 2.50) | – | – |
LOSD | 1 | 0.57 (0.11, 2.87) | 0.0% | 0.43 (0.16, 1.10) | 0.0% | 0.879 |
Comparison 3 | ||||||
ESD | 2 | 0.37 (0.10, 1.34) | 0.0% | 0.24 (0.02, 2.90) | 0.0% | – |
PCD | 2 | 0.28 (0.02, 3.98) | 86.6% | 0.23 (0.01, 1.80) | 86.8% | – |
MIS | 2 | 0.48 (0.24, 0.93) | 0.0% | 0.42 (0.04, 4.20) | 0.0% | – |
MODS rate | ||||||
Comparison 1 | ||||||
MID | 2 | 0.40 (0.08, 1.98) | 78.4% | 0.29 (0.02, 1.30) | 76.7% | – |
OSD | 0 | – | – | 0.85 (0.04, 5.70) | – | – |
Comparison 2 | ||||||
EMID | 1 | 0.62 (0.26, 1.48) | 0.0% | 0.43 (0.20, 0.76) | 0.0% | – |
LMID | 1 | Can not be calculated | – | 0.18 (0.06,0.46) | – | – |
EOSD | 0 | – | – | 0.57 (0.11, 2.70) | – | – |
LOSD | 0 | – | – | 0.44 (0.16, 1.10) | – | – |
Comparison 3 | ||||||
ESD | 0 | – | – | – | ||
PCD | 1 | Can not be calculated | – | 3.70−12 (9.70−32, 0.06) | – | – |
MIS | 1 | 0.62 (0.26, 1.48) | 0.0% | 0.56 (0.03, 1.10) | 0.0% | – |