Skip to main content

Table 4 Characteristics and results of studies externally validating PDRI and P-PASS

From: Risk indices predicting graft use, graft and patient survival in solid pancreas transplantation: a systematic review

Study, year (transplant type)

Risk index (including any risk groups)

Cohort size, source (study dates)

Outcome

Handling of missing data

Other sources of bias or applicability concerns

Discrimination (or other analysis of association with outcome performed)

Calibration*

Study conclusion

Amaral PHF 2015

(All) [36]

PDRI

 ≤ 1.0, > 1.0—< 1.5

 ≥ 1.5

570 pancreas recipients four hospitals, Brazil (1996–2011)

1-year pancreas survival

Complete case analysis (Only 27% of cohort with PDRI)

No treatment details

No comparison of baseline data to derivation study

Graft failure undefined

Donor race coded differently to derivation

Different PDRI cutoffs to derivation (no reason given)

Unclear if graft survival was censored

NI

Observed: 23 pancreas failed

Predicted: NI

PDRI not associated with 1-year pancreas survival

Ayami MS 2018 (All) [37]

PDRI

 < 1, 1–1.5, > 1.5

327 pancreas recipients at a single centre, Gernany (2002–2015)

1-, 5-,10-year pancreas, kidney and patient survival

Complete case analysis (Only 98.5% of cohort with PDRI

No treatment details

No baseline demographics of predictor variables in cohort

No comparison of baseline data to derivation study

Different PDRI cutoffs (and not analysed as a continuous model)

Donor race set to Caucasian

NI

Observed: 72 pancreas failed

Predicted: NI

PDR I > 1.5 associated with worse pancreas survival, but no differences between other risk groups

PDRI not associated with kidney or patient survival

Blok JJ 2016 (All) [8]

PDRI

 < 1.24, ≥ 1.24 (median) and as CN

349 pancreas recipients at a single centre, Germany (1984–2013)

1-, 5-, 10-year pancreas survival (DC)

Complete case analysis (Only 98.6% of cohort with PDRI)

No treatment details

Donor race set to Caucasian as not collected by Eurotransplant,

No comparison of baseline data to derivation study

Different cutoffs for PDRI (median)

PDRI by categories:

C-statistic 0.69 (SE 0.045)

PDRI as a CN model:

NI

Observed: 54 pancreas failed at 1 year

Predicted: NI

PDRI ≥ 1.24 associated with worse 1-, 5-, 10-years pancreas survival but not when analyzed as a CN model

Franz C 2019 (SPK, PAK) [38]

PDRI

 ≥ 1.198 vs < 1.198 (median)

108 pancreas recipients at a single centre, Germany (2000–2017)

1-, 5-year pancreas survival (DC)

NMD

No comparison of baseline data to derivation study

PDRI with different cut-offs from original (and not analysed as a continuous model)

NI

Observed: 27 pancreas failed at 1 year

Predicted: NI

PDRI ≥ 1.198 vs < 1.198 not associated with all outcomes

Horvath S 2015

(All) [39]

PDRI

 > 1.57, ≤ 1.57

119 pancreas recipients from single centre, UK (period not clear)

1-year pancreas survival

Complete case analysis

(Only 97% of cohort with PDRI)

No treatment details (abstract)

Graft failure undefined

PDRI with different cutoffs

Unclear if graft survival was censored

No baseline demographics of predictor variables in cohort

NI

NI

PDRI not associated with 1-year pancreas survival

Kopp W 2016 (pancreas donors) [40]

P-PASS < 17, ≥ 17 and as CN

10,444 pancreas donors from Eurotransplant registry (2004–2014)

Donor pancreas accepted, procured, transplanted

Complete case analysis (Only 93.7% of cohort with P-PASS)

No comparison of baseline data to derivation study

Donor race set to Caucasian as not collected routinely

C-statistic for P-PASS in donors:

Reported vs non-reported (0.63, 95% CI 0.62–0.63)

Accepted vs non-accepted (0.68, 95% CI 0.67–0.69)

Procured vs non-procured (0.68, 95% CI 0.67–0.69)

Transplanted vs non-transplanted (0.73, 95% CI 0.72–0.74)

Observed: 4354 (41.7%) donor pancreas declined

Predicted: 6298 (60.3%) donors with P-PASS ≥ 17

O/E ratio: 0.69

P-PASS < 17 associated with reported, accepted, procured and transplanted pancreas donors vs P-PASS ≥ 17

Lan L 2010 (pancreas donors) [45]

Modified P-PASS (minus serum sodium) (CN)

220 pancreas donors from a single centre, Australia (2005–2008)

Donor pancreas acceptance

NI

No treatment details (abstract)

Serum sodium not included as not collected by registry (different to derivation)

No comparison of baseline data to derivation study

NI

Observed: 93 donor pancreas declined

Predicted: NI

Modified P-PASS associated with pancreas donor acceptance

Mittal S 2013

(SPK and PTA) [41]

PDRI

0.64–0.85

0.86–1.15

1.16–1.56

1.57–2.11

2.11–2.56

 > 2.57

90 pancreas recipients from a single centre, UK (2011)

1-year pancreas survival

NMD

Graft failure undefined

No treatment details

NI

O/E ratio: 0.84–1.1 (SPK)

0.76–1.12 (PTA)

Higher PDRI quintiles associated with 1-year pancreas survival for SPK but not PTA

Mittal S 2015

(All) [42]

PDRI (CN)

1265 pancreas recipients from a national registry, UK (2004–2011)

1-year pancreas survival (DC)

Complete case analysis

(Only 76% of cohort with PDRI)

None

NI

Observed: NI

Predicted: NI

PDRI associated with 1-year pancreas survival for SPK

 

PDRI

0.64–0.85

0.86–1.15

1.16–1.56

1.57–2.11

    

NI

NI

PDRI quartile 0.64–0.85 associated with better 1-year pancreas survival for SPK vs quartiles 1.16–1.56, 1.57–2.11

Rodriguez-Villar C 2018 (Pancreas donors) [34]

P-PASS

 < 17, ≥ 17

78 pancreas donors at a single centre, Spain (2016–2017)

Donor pancreas acceptance

NMD

No comparison of baseline data to derivation study

NI

Observed: 41 donor pancreas declined

Predicted: 57 donor pancreas declined

O/E ratio: 0.72

P-PASS associated with donor pancreas acceptance

Salamanca-Bustos JJ 2016 (SPK) [9]

PDRI

0.64–0.85

0.86–1.15

1.16–1.56

1.57–2.11

2.12–2.86

126 pancreas recipients at a single-centre, Spain (2000–2015)

1-year pancreas survival

Complete case analysis

(Only 94% of cohort with PDRI)

All donors set to Caucasian

No treatment details

No comparison of baseline data to derivation study

NI

Observed: 16 pancreas failure

Predicted: NI

PDRI in quintiles not associated with 1-year pancreas survival

Smigielska K 2018 (All) [11]

PDRI (CN)

408 pancreas recipients at multiple centres, Poland (1998–2015)

1-year pancreas survival

Complete case analysis

(Only 73% of cohort with PDRI)

No treatment details

No comparison of baseline data to derivation study

AUROC for

PDRI: 0.524

Observed: 139 pancreas failure

Predicted: NI

PDRI not associated with 1-year pancreas

  1. All graft survival is uncensored for death unless otherwise stated
  2. *Observed and expected outcomes are for 1-year pancreas survival for PDRI and donor pancreas acceptance for P-PASS (both the outcomes PDRI and P-PASS were derived against respectively) unless otherwise specified
  3. **Based on mean/median PDRI for entire cohort
  4. A abstract, CIT cold ischaemia time, CN continuous, DC death-censored (all studies non-DC unless stated), DP donor pancreas, F full-text, MC multicentre, NI no information, NMD no missing data, O/E observed and predicted (expected) ratio, PDRI pancreas donor risk index, PGS pancreas graft survival, P-PASS pre-procurement pancreas allocation suitability score, PTA pancreas transplant alone, R registry, SC single centre, SE standard error, UK United Kingdom, USA United States of America