Skip to main content

Table 3 Data extraction table from update search: Clinical effectiveness and safety of implantable bulking agents (Sphinkeeperâ„¢ [THD s.p.A., Italy]) for faecal incontinence

From: Clinical effectiveness and safety of self-expandable implantable bulking agents for faecal incontinence: a systematic review

Product

Sphinkeeperâ„¢

References

Dawoud [36]

Colbran [37]

Country

Austria

Australia

Sponsor

None (no CoI)

None (no CoI)

Comparator

None

None

Study design

Prospective, before-after, single-arm, single-centre

Prospective, before-after, single-arm, single-centre

Conducted in

2018–2020

02/2018–09/2019

Indication

Refractory FI

FI not specified

Intervention

Median: 9 prostheses

10 prostheses

Number of pts at baseline

11 (9 females)

13 (11 females)

Number of pts analysed

11 (9 females)

12 (females: NR)

Loss to FU, n (%)

0 (0)

1 (7.7)

Age of patients, yrs median (range) [36]

Mean age ± SD [37]

75 (46–89)

56.7 ± 12.7

Inclusion criteria

Failure to respond to conservative treatment

> 18 yrs

FI symptoms > 12 months

Ongoing symptoms despite conservative measures

FI episodes > 1x/week

Exclusion criteria

Malignant disease

Rectal bleeding of unknown origin

Inflammatory bowel disease

Malignancy

Inflammatory bowel disease

Untreated rectal prolapse

Acute perianal sepsis

Obstructed defaecation syndrome or chronic constipation

Neurological disease

Previous rectal resection and sphincter defects > 120º

Clinical outcome measures

Clinical effectiveness: FI severity (Vaizey [= St Mark’s incontinence score])

Safety: migration of prostheses (3D endo-anal ultrasound)

Clinical effectiveness: FI severity (CCFI, Vaizey), QoL (FIQL)

Safety: positioning of the prostheses (3D endo-anal ultrasound)

FU, months

Median: 8 (range 3–18)

3, 12

Outcomes

Clinical effectiveness

Faecal incontinence severity

Vaizey (points [36] or mean ± SD [37])

 Preoperative

22 points

10.5 ± 9.5

 Postoperative 3 months

NR

9.0 ± 10.8

 Postoperative 8 months

13 points; p = 0.008

NR

 Postoperative 12 months

NR

9.0 ± 10.3; p = 0.264

CCFIS (mean ± SD [37])

 Preoperative

NR

10.8 ± 4.9

 Postoperative 3 months

NR

9.3 ± 5.8

 Postoperative 12 months

NR

8.3 ± 6.2; p = 0.175

FIQL: lifestyle (mean ± SD [37])

 Preoperative

NR

2.8 ± 2.8

 Postoperative 3 months

NR

3 ± 1.5

 Postoperative 12 months

NR

3.4 ± 1.7; p = 0.527

FIQL: coping/behaviour (mean ± SD [37])

 Preoperative

NR

1.9 ± 0.9

 Postoperative 3 months

NR

2.4 ± 1.0

 Postoperative 12 months

NR

2.6 ± 1.0; p = 0.047

FIQL: depression/self-perception (mean ± SD [37])

 Preoperative

NR

2.75 ± 1

 Postoperative 3 months

NR

3.3 ± 1.6

 Postoperative 12 months

NR

3.1 ± 1.5; p = 0.132

FIQL: embarrassment (mean ± SD [37])

 Preoperative

NR

2.2 ± 1.0

 Postoperative 3 months

NR

2.3 ± 0.8

 Postoperative 12 months

NR

2.6 ± 1.0; p = 0.156

Outcomes

Safety (n [%])

Procedure-related adverse events

 Intraoperative complications

0 (0)

1 (7.7) (rectal perforation)

 Postoperative complications/morbidity

NR

NR

 Infection/sepsis/ inflammation

NR

NR

 Anal discomfort/pain, analgesia > 48 h

1 (9)

NR

 Adverse effect/reaction/general complication

NR

NR

Device-related adverse events

 Dislodgement of prostheses

10 (91)

NR

 Prosthesis removed/extruded

1 (9)

3 (23.1)

  1. CCFIS Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence score, CoI conflict of interest, FI faecal incontinence, FIQL Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score, FU follow-up, NR not reported, pts patients, QoL quality of life, SD standard deviation, yrs years
  2. Scores:
  3. CCFIS: The Wexner Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence Score (CCFIS) includes five parameters regarding the type of incontinence and five response options [30]. The total score ranges from 0 (normal continence) to 20 (total incontinence) [30]
  4. Vaizey: The Vaizey score is similar to the CCFIS [31]. The total score ranges from 0 (perfect continence) to 24 (totally incontinent) [31]
  5. FIQL: The Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL) comprises 29 items and forms four subscales, including lifestyle, coping/behaviour, depression/self-perception, and embarrassment [24, 32]. The scale ranges from 1 (low status of QoL) to 5 (high status of QoL) [32]
  6. AMS: The American Medical Systems score (AMS) is a modification of the FIQL and assesses the physical, psychological and social impact, pad use, lifestyle alterations, embarrassment/shame, depression, and coping/behaviour [24]. The AMS score ranges from 0 (high status of QoL) to 120 (low status of QoL) [10]