Skip to main content

Table 4 Descriptive analysis of partial economic evaluations for liver metastases from colorectal cancer (lmCRC)

From: Economic evaluations of radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres in liver metastases of colorectal cancer: a systematic review

Author, year, publication type and country

Patient’s characteristic

Treatments

Analysis type/Clinical source

Perspective/Time horizon

Outcomes

Comparators

Microspheres

Fusco, 2017 [28]

Communication at congress

United Kingdom

lmCRC not suitable for resection/ablation; chemotherapy-naïve

(First line treatment) a

Y-90 TARE + FOLFOX vs.

FOLFOX

Y-90 resin microspheres

CA /

FOXFIRE clinical trial

Payer/

3 years

Direct cost (medical) on Primary care resource.

QoL

Dhir, 2018 [29]

Original article

USA

lmCRC liver-only unresectable

(Second line treatment) b

Y-90 TARE + MDR vs. HAI + MDR

ND

CA /

Retrospective study

Payer/

2 years

Direct cost (medical) estimated retrospectively by the consumption of hospital resources.

OS

  1. HAI: hepatic artery infusion (pump) with floxuridine, FOLFOX: folinic acid, fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, lmCRC: liver metastases from colorectal cancer, OS: overall survival, QoL: quality of life, MDR: multi-drug regimens including oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan ± biological treatments, Y-90 TARE: transarterial radioembolization with yttrium 90
  2. a. Chemotherapy-naïve metastatic colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases. The sample size reported in this analysis considered the clinical trial data from FOXFIRE study [36] (N = 364), and then specified patients treated according to Wasan et al. 2017 [40] (Y-90 TARE + FOLFOX n = 167; FOLFOX n = 169). b. Pre-treated patients with a heavy liver tumour burden (median of 10 lesions and almost 40% of liver parenchymal replacement by tumour). The sample size reported in this analysis considered the clinical data from Dhir et al. 2018 [29] study (Y-90 TARE n = 49; HAI n = 48)