Table 3 Comparison of the results of second colonoscopy between the two groups
From: Effectiveness of switching endoscopists for repeat surveillance colonoscopy: a retrospective study
Outcomes | D group | S group | p value |
|---|---|---|---|
Number of patients (Total: 205) | 102 | 103 | |
High resolution scope, n (%) | 59 (57.8) | 37 (35.9) | 0.002 |
Scope change (the initial CS → the second CS) | |||
High-resolution → Standard | 8 (7.8) | 13 (12.6) | 0.26 |
Standard → High-resolution | 35 (34.3) | 15 (14.6) | 0.001 |
Performed by a trainee, n (%) | 10 (9.8) | 21 (20.4) | 0.03 |
BBPS ≥ 6, n (%) | 95 (93.1) | 101 (98.1) | 0.09 |
Withdrawal time > 6 min, n (%) | 91 (89.2) | 90 (87.4) | 0.68 |
Total withdrawal time, median (IQR) | 11.8 (8.0-15.5) | 11.8 (8.3–16.7) | 0.94 |
Midazolam usage, n (%) | 92 (90.2) | 97 (94.2) | 0.29 |
Pethidine hydrochloride usage, n (%) | 30 (29.4) | 52 (50.5) | 0.002 |
Antispasmodic usage, n (%) | 0.13 | ||
Scopolamine butylbromide | 70 (68.6) | 68 (66.0) | |
Glucagon | 32 (31.4) | 31 (30.1) | |
None | 0 (0) | 4 (3.8) | |
Missed lesion detection rate (%) | 61.8 | 31.1 | < 0.0001 |
Missed lesions per colonoscopy (95%CI) | 1.29 (1.00-1.58) | 0.60 (0.39–0.81) | < 0.0001 |