Skip to main content
Download PDF

Postoperative liver dysfunction is associated with poor long-term outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Gastroenterology volume 23, Article number: 128 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Postoperative hepatobiliary enzyme abnormalities often present as postoperative liver dysfunction in patients with colorectal cancer. This study aimed to clarify the risk factors of postoperative liver dysfunction and its prognostic impact following colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed data from 360 consecutive patients who underwent radical resection for Stage I–IV colorectal cancer between 2015 and 2019. A subset of 249 patients with Stage III colorectal cancer were examined to assess the prognostic impact of liver dysfunction.

Results

Forty-eight (13.3%) colorectal cancer patients (Stages I–IV) developed postoperative liver dysfunction (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 CTCAE v5.0 ≥ Grade 2). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the liver-to-spleen ratio on preoperative plain computed tomography (L/S ratio; P = 0.002, Odds ratio 2.66) as an independent risk factor for liver dysfunction. Patients with postoperative liver dysfunction showed significantly poorer disease-free survival than patients without liver dysfunction (P < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox’s proportional hazards model revealed that postoperative liver dysfunction independently was a poor prognostic factor (P = 0.001, Hazard ratio 2.75, 95% CI: 1.54–4.73).

Conclusions

Postoperative liver dysfunction was associated with poor long-term outcomes in patients with Stage III colorectal cancer. A low liver-to-spleen ratio on preoperative plain computed tomography images was an independent risk factor of postoperative liver dysfunction.

Peer Review reports

Background

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly occurring cancer in the world [1]. Despite recent advances in surgical procedures and chemotherapy, tumor recurrence is often observed in CRC patients after curative resection, leading to a high mortality rate. Therefore, it is important to identify reliable predictors of patients at high risk of tumor recurrence.

The association between postoperative adverse events and poor long-term outcomes has been reported in various surgical fields [2,3,4]. In CRC, postoperative complications were associated with tumor recurrence and poor outcomes [5]. Therefore, postoperative liver dysfunction may also be associated with the deterioration of long-term outcomes. Although postoperative hepatobiliary enzyme abnormalities often present as postoperative liver dysfunction in patients with CRC, there have been no reports concerning the prognostic impact of postoperative liver dysfunction, to the best of our knowledge.

In this study, we retrospectively identified putative risk factors for the occurrence of postoperative liver dysfunction and investigated the prognostic impact of postoperative liver dysfunction among CRC patients who received radical resection. Our results will provide evidence to clarify the association between postoperative liver dysfunction occurrence and poor prognosis in patients with CRC.

Methods

Patients

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine and the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (ERB-C-1178–1). We retrospectively analyzed data from 583 consecutive patients who underwent surgical resection with lymph node dissection for Stages I–IV colorectal cancer between 2015 and 2019. Patients were excluded if they had preoperative hepatobiliary enzyme abnormalities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 CTCAE v5.0 ≥ Grade 1), distant metastasis including liver metastasis, other cancers, received colectomy with combined resection, or had undergone an emergency operation. All 18 cases of distant metastasis were liver metastasis, with no metastasis to other organs. Ultimately, 360 patients were included in this study. Patient characteristics, pathological and surgical findings, and postoperative clinical courses were reviewed from medical records and databases at our institution (Fig. 1). In addition, to assess the prognostic effect of postoperative liver dysfunction, we retrospectively analyzed data from 249 consecutive patients who underwent radical resection for Stage III colorectal cancer.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flowchart for selecting and classifying subject

Full size image

The preoperative diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma was confirmed by endoscopy and biopsy. Patients with lower rectal cancer, clinically diagnosed as T3 or deeper, underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapies followed by radical surgery. The patients underwent colorectal resection and lymph node dissection according to the guidelines of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum [6]. Surgical oncologists agreed on all surgical procedures in a preoperative multidisciplinary conference. Tumor stages were determined based on the International Union Against Cancer tumor, node, and metastasis classification system (8th ed.) [7]. Macroscopic and histological cancer types were classified according to the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma (8th ed.) [8]. Physical examinations, blood tests, including tumor markers such as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), computed tomography (CT), and colonoscopies, were conducted every 3–6 months after surgery. Tumor recurrence was confirmed radiographically, and treatments were initiated immediately.

A range of clinical factors were examined for their association with postoperative liver dysfunction in CRC patients. Serum levels of aspartate transaminase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and total bilirubin (T-BIL) were evaluated in all patients. Hepatobiliary enzyme abnormalities were assessed using CTCAE v5.0 diagnostic criteria as recommended by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (Supplementary Table 1). Serum hepatobiliary enzyme levels were measured routinely preoperatively, on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7, and based on the postoperative course thereafter. In addition, serum liver enzyme levels were measured at every outpatient visit. Postoperative liver dysfunction was defined by postoperative hepatobiliary enzyme abnormalities of Grade 2 or higher, while severe postoperative liver dysfunction was defined by hepatobiliary enzyme abnormalities of Grade 3 or higher.

Risk factor identification and prognostic impact

First, we investigated potential clinicopathological factors to identify the independent risk factors of postoperative liver dysfunction using univariate and multivariate logistic analyses (Table 1). Second, we examined the putative risk factors for severe postoperative liver dysfunction (Table 2). Then, we observed the features of liver dysfunction during the postoperative period (Table 3). Finally, to confirm the clinical effects of postoperative liver dysfunction, we compared the survival curves of patients with or without postoperative liver dysfunction following radical resection for stage III colorectal cancer (Fig. 2). The prognostic effects of postoperative liver dysfunction were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses with Cox’s proportional hazard ratios (Table 4).

Table 1 Univariate and multivariate analyses of the potential risk factors for postoperative liver dysfunction
Full size table
Table 2 The clinical factors of patients with severe (CTCAE Grade ≥ 3) and non-severe (CTCAE Grade 2) postoperative liver dysfunction
Full size table
Table 3 The profile of postoperative liver dysfunction
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

Overall survival curves (A) and disease-free survival curves (B) of Stage III CRC patients with and without postoperative liver dysfunction

Full size image
Table 4 Disease-free survival after surgery for Stage III colorectal cancer
Full size table

Fatty liver assessment

To assess the impact of fatty liver on liver dysfunction, we used preoperative CT images to calculate the liver-to-spleen ratio (L/S ratio) [9, 10]. The Hounsfield unit (HU) values of four regions of interest (ROIs), two in the liver (one from each lobe) and two in the spleen, were measured in the preoperative plain CT of each patient. All ROIs were a circle of 2-cm diameter, avoiding heterogeneous areas such as blood vessels and cysts. The L/S ratio was calculated as the quotient of the average HU value from both ROIs in the liver and spleen.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using JMP version 10 (ASA Institute, Cary, NC). To compare the clinicopathological characteristics of the two groups, Chi-squared and Fisher’s exact probability tests were performed for categorical variables, and Student’s t-tests and Mann–Whitney U-tests were performed with unpaired continuous data. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method, and statistical differences were examined using the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using the likelihood ratio test of the stratified Cox proportional hazards model. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Clinicopathological factors of postoperative liver dysfunction

A total of 48 patients had postoperative liver dysfunction (Grade 2: n = 38; Grade 3: n = 10). By univariate analysis, postoperative liver dysfunction was significantly associated with the use of low-molecular-weight heparin (P = 0.031), and a low liver-to-spleen ratio on preoperative plain CT (L/S ratio < 1.268; P = 0.001; Table 1). Multivariate analysis also revealed that the L/S ratio (P = 0.002, HR 2.66 [95% CI: 1.42–5.18]) was an independent risk factor for postoperative liver dysfunction (Table 1). Comorbidities, such as chronic liver disease, were not significantly associated with postoperative liver dysfunction (Supplementary Table 2).

Risk factors influencing the severity of postoperative liver dysfunction

Ten patients (20.8% (10/48)) were classified with severe postoperative liver dysfunction, with the remaining 38 (79.2% (38/48)) patients classified as grade 2. Univariate analysis revealed that severe postoperative liver dysfunction was significantly associated with lower albumin-bilirubin scores (ALBI ≥ -2.6; P = 0.032). There were no correlations between the severity of postoperative liver dysfunction and gender, age, obesity, drinking habits, use of low-molecular-weight heparin, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, L/S ratio, FIB-4 index, Hepatic stenosis index, surgical approach, tumor location, anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, postoperative ileus, operative time, blood loss, or intraoperative blood transfusion (Table 2).

Hepatobiliary enzyme abnormalities

Hepatobiliary enzyme abnormalities are seen in various types of liver disease, including hepatitis virus infection, alcohol-induced liver injury, drug-induced liver injury, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. The pathophysiology of liver dysfunction is classified into three types: hepatocellular, cholestasis, and mixed [11]. However, the pattern of hepatobiliary enzyme abnormalities after surgery for CRC remains unknown. Therefore, we assessed liver dysfunction profiles according to the type of elevated enzyme (Supplementary Table 3). There was no significant difference in the median interval between surgery and the onset of liver dysfunction between the severity groups (Table 2). Regarding the peak enzyme values, ALP was significantly higher in patients with severe postoperative liver dysfunction (P = 0.026; Table 2).

Prognostic impact of postoperative liver dysfunction in Stage III CRC

Figure 2 shows the overall survival curves and disease-free survival (DFS) curves of patients with and without postoperative liver dysfunction following radical resection for Stage III colorectal cancer. Patients with postoperative liver dysfunction showed a significantly poorer prognosis than patients without liver dysfunction (P = 0.0009). Univariate and multivariate analyses using Cox’s proportional hazards model revealed that postoperative liver dysfunction was an independent prognostic factor affecting DFS (P = 0.001, HR 2.50, 95% CI: 1.20–4.91; Table 3).

Discussion

Our study reveals that postoperative liver dysfunction is strongly associated with worse DFS after radical surgery for Stage III colorectal cancer. Furthermore, a low L/S ratio on preoperative CT was strongly associated with postoperative liver dysfunction in patients with colorectal cancer. Postoperative complications increase tumor recurrence rate and reduce overall survival in patients with colorectal cancer [5, 12]. However, to our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate that postoperative liver dysfunction independently contributes to a poorer prognosis among colorectal cancer patients.

To clarify the mechanism by which postoperative liver dysfunction affects long-term prognosis, we investigated whether liver metastasis is present at the surgery for CRC and whether the presence of postoperative liver dysfunction influences adjuvant chemotherapy. Regarding the potential of liver metastases, fatty liver, which causes postoperative liver dysfunction, makes it difficult to detect liver metastasis [13]. Since a fatty liver is an independent risk factor for postoperative liver dysfunction, its recurrence form was also examined. However, there was no significant difference in the frequency of liver metastasis recurrence between patients with or without postoperative liver dysfunction. Postoperative complications are significantly associated with worse rates and delays in adjuvant chemotherapy [14, 15]. However, in this study, the induction rate of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy did not differ between patients with or without postoperative liver dysfunction (Supplementary Table 4). Several previous reports describe an association between preoperative liver dysfunction and poor prognosis [16, 17]. The serum AST/ALT ratio (a biomarker for cirrhosis), insulin resistance, and alcoholic liver disease are valid prognostic markers for DFS in Stage II and III CRC patients [16]. In addition, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), caused by the accumulation of excess fat in hepatocytes, are also prognostic factors for tumor recurrence after radical surgical resection [17,18,19]. These reports suggest that chronic inflammation of the liver affects CRC prognosis. In this study, we found an association between postoperative liver dysfunction and the L/S ratio. The absence of a direct prognostic correlation between multiple liver reserve indicators, namely L/S ratio, ALBI score, FIB-4 index, and Hepatic stenosis index, and CRC implies that the unfavorable prognosis of CRC could potentially be attributed to chronic inflammation resulting from fatty liver (Supplementary Fig. 1).

Notably, our study revealed that a fatty liver, closely associated with lifestyle factors such as diet and exercise, increases the risk of preoperative liver dysfunction and may be a modifiable risk factor for perioperative liver dysfunction. Reportedly, a six-month intervention to modify the lifestyle of patients with NAFLD reduced their body weight, improving markers of fatty liver and liver function [20]. Moreover, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors improve the fatty liver in patients with NAFLD and type 2 diabetes mellitus [21]. As demonstrated in previous interventions aimed at modifying lifestyle factors, improvement in markers of fatty liver and liver function in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) can be achieved. These findings suggest that lifestyle improvements and appropriate preoperative interventions may prevent postoperative liver dysfunction and ultimately improve the prognosis for CRC patients, particularly those with a fatty liver. Therefore, it is essential to consider lifestyle modifications and preoperative interventions to mitigate perioperative liver dysfunction and ultimately improve the prognosis for CRC patients.

There were several limitations of this study, including its retrospective nature and single-center sample. Large prospective cohort studies are needed to validate these findings before clinical application. Additionally, this study included patients with colorectal cancer in various locations and stages. Therefore, several perioperative factors might have also influenced postoperative liver dysfunction. However, it was difficult to completely remove the influence of perioperative factors on postoperative liver status.

Conclusions

Our study found that postoperative liver dysfunction might be a crucial mechanism leading to poor prognosis in patients with CRC. Postoperative liver dysfunction was associated with poor long-term outcomes in patients with Stage III colorectal cancer. The occurrence of postoperative liver dysfunction in colorectal cancer is significantly associated with a low liver-to-spleen ratio on preoperative plain CT. Preoperative interventions for patients with the potential for a fatty liver may improve the prognosis for CRC.

Availability of data and materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Abbreviations

CTCAE:

Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events

CRC:

Colorectal cancer

CT:

Computed tomography

L/S:

Liver-to-spleen

AST:

Aspartate transaminase

ALT:

Alanine aminotransferase

HU:

Hounsfield unit

ROIs:

Regions of interest

DFS:

Disease-free survival

NAFLD:

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

References

  1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Mantovani A, Allavene P, Sica A, Balkwill F. Cancer-related inflammation. Nature. 2008;454(7203):436–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lerut T, Moons J, Coosemans W, Raemdonck D, Leyn P, Decaluwé H, Decker G, Nafteuxet P. Postoperative complications after transthoracic esophagectomy for cancer of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction are correlated with early cancer recurrence: role of systematic grading of complications using the modified Clavien classification. Ann Surg. 2009;250(5):798–807.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Artinyan A, Orcutt ST, Anaya DA, Richardson P, Chen GJ, Berger DH. Infectious postoperative complications decrease long-term survival in patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer: a study of 12,075 patients. Ann Surg. 2015;261(3):497–505.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gamboa AC, Lee RM, Turgeon MK, Varlamos C, Regenbogen SE, Hrebinko KA, Holder-Murray J, Wiseman JT, Ejaz A, Feng MP, et al. Impact of Postoperative Complications on Oncologic Outcomes After Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Analysis of the US Rectal Cancer Consortium. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28(3):1712–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Watanabe T, Muro K, Ajioka Y, Hashiguchi Y, Ito Y, Saito Y, Hamaguchi T, Ishida H, Ishiguro M, Ishihara S, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2016 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018;23(1):1–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. James D. Brierley, MKG, Christian Wittekind. TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours, 8th Edition. Wiley; 2016. p. 100–5.

  8. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Japanese Classification of Colorectal, Appendiceal, and Anal Carcinoma: the 3d English Edition [Secondary Publication]. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2019;3(4):175–95.

  9. Zeb I, Li D, Nasir K, Katz R, Larijani VN, Budoff MJ. Computed tomography scans in the evaluation of fatty liver disease in a population based study: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Acad Radiol. 2012;19(7):811–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Sumida Y, Nakajima A, Itoh Y. Limitations of liver biopsy and non-invasive diagnostic tests for the diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(2):475–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Nozawa H, Emoto S, Sonoda H, Kawai K, Sasaki K, Kaneko M, et al. Liver Injury Among Japanese Patients Treated Using Prophylactic Enoxaparin After Colorectal Surgery. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66(8):2805–15.

  12. Matsubara D, Arita T, Nakanishi M, Kuriu Y, Murayama Y, Kudou M, Konishi H, Komatsu S, Shiozaki A, Otsuji E. The impact of postoperative inflammation on recurrence in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2020;25(4):602–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nakai H, Arizono S, Isoda H, Togashi K. Imaging Characteristics of Liver Metastases Overlooked at Contrast-Enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019;212(4):782–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Arhi CS, Burns EM, Bouras G, Aylin P, Ziprin P, Darzi A. Complications after discharge and delays in adjuvant chemotherapy following colonic resection: a cohort study of linked primary and secondary care data. Colorectal Dis. 2019;21(3):307–14.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fransgaard T, Caspar Thygesen L, Gögenur I. The impact of postoperative complications and delay of adjuvant chemotherapy on oncological outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2021;23(5):1132–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li L, Zeng Q, Xue N, Wu M, Liang Y, Xu Q, Feng L, Xing S, Chen S. A Nomogram Based on Aspartate Aminotransferase/Alanine Aminotransferase (AST/ALT) Ratio to Predict Prognosis After Surgery in Gastric Cancer Patients. Cancer Control. 2020;27(1):1073274820954458.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lv Y, Patel N, Zhang HJ. The progress of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease as the risk of liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;13(12):1169–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kondo T, Okabayashi K, Hasegawa H, Tsuruta M, Shigeta T, Kitagawa Y. The impact of hepatic fibrosis on the incidence of liver metastasis from colorectal cancer. Br J Cancer. 2016;115(1):34–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Cox TR, Bird D, Baker AM, Barker HE, Ho MW, Lang G, Erler JT. LOX-mediated collagen crosslinking is responsible for fibrosis-enhanced metastasis. Cancer Res. 2013;73(6):1721–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Oza N, Eguchi Y, Mizuta T, Ishibashi E, Kitajima Y, Horie H, Ushirogawa M, Tsuzura T, Nakashita S, Takahashi H, et al. A pilot trial of body weight reduction for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with a home-based lifestyle modification intervention delivered in collaboration with interdisciplinary medical staff. J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(12):1203–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kinoshita T, Shimoda M, Nakashima K, Fushimi Y, Hirata Y, Tanabe A, Tatsumi F, Hirukawa H, Sanada J, Kohara K, et al. Comparison of the effects of three kinds of glucose-lowering drugs on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized, open-label, three-arm, active control study. J Diabetes Investig. 2020;11(6):1612–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Cambridge English Correction Service (https://cambridge-correction.com), for editing a draft of this manuscript.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Shutaro Sumiyoshi and Jun Kiuchi equally contributed to this work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, 465 Kajii-Cho, Kyoto, Kawaramachihirokoji, Kamigyo-Ku, Japan

    Shutaro Sumiyoshi, Jun Kiuchi, Yoshiaki Kuriu, Tomohiro Arita, Hiroki Shimizu, Wataru Takaki, Takuma Ohashi, Yusuke Yamamoto, Hirotaka Konishi, Ryo Morimura, Atsushi Shiozaki, Hisashi Ikoma, Takeshi Kubota, Hitoshi Fujiwara, Kazuma Okamoto & Eigo Otsuji

Authors
  1. Shutaro Sumiyoshi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jun Kiuchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshiaki Kuriu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tomohiro Arita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hiroki Shimizu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wataru Takaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Takuma Ohashi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Yusuke Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Hirotaka Konishi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ryo Morimura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Atsushi Shiozaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Hisashi Ikoma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Takeshi Kubota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  14. Hitoshi Fujiwara
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  15. Kazuma Okamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  16. Eigo Otsuji
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SS and JK contributed to the study design. YK, TA, HS, WT contributed to the data collection and data analysis. YY, HK, RM, AS, TK, EO contributed to interpretation and statistical analyses. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Kiuchi.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval and consent to participate

This study was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine and the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Board of the Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine (ERB-C-1178–1).

Consent for publications

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1. 

Hepatic reserve index and prognostic evaluation

Additional file 2: Table S1.

Definition of Hepatobiliary Enzyme Abnormalities inCommon Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

Additional file 3: Table S2.

The association between postoperative comorbiditiesand postoperative liver dysfunction.

Additional file 4: Table S3.

Changes in hepatobiliary enzymes in patient withpostoperative liver dysfunction.

Additional file 5: Table S4.

The association between postoperative liverdysfunction and Stage III CRC patient characteristics.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sumiyoshi, S., Kiuchi, J., Kuriu, Y. et al. Postoperative liver dysfunction is associated with poor long-term outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol 23, 128 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12876-023-02762-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12876-023-02762-y

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us