Skip to main content
Download PDF

Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with non-doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation for the treatment of grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a single centre retrospective study

BMC Gastroenterology volume 23, Article number: 293 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) is the most widely used surgical procedure because of its precise curative effect, but it has the disadvantages such as obvious postoperative pain and bleeding. To retrospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of MMH combined with non-Doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation (MMH + ND-HAL) for the treatment of grade III/IV hemorrhoids.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of 115 patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids, 53 patients had received MMH + ND-HAL, and the remaining 62 patients received MMH. We collected and compared demographic and clinical characteristics of both groups, including intraoperative blood loss, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, analgesic consumption, postoperative bleeding, perianal incision edema, urinary retention, anal stenosis, anal incontinence incidence, recurrence rate (prolapse or bleeding), and patient satisfaction.

Results

The VAS pain score of the first postoperative defecation and at the postoperative 12 h, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, and 7 days, as well as the total analgesic consumption within 7 days, for the MMH + ND-HAL group were lower than those for the MMH group (P < 0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, the incidence of postoperative bleeding, perianal incision edema, and urinary retention in the MMH + ND-HAL group was lower than that in the MMH group (P < 0.05). No anal stenosis or anal incontinence occurred in either group. At follow-up by telephone or outpatient 12 months after surgery, the recurrence rate (prolapse or bleeding) was lower in the MMH + ND-HAL group than in the MMH group (P < 0.05), and satisfaction was higher in the MMH + ND-HAL group than in the MMH group (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

MMH + ND-HAL was a satisfactory surgical modality for treating III/IV hemorrhoids.

Peer Review reports

Background

Hemorrhoids are one of the most common anorectal diseases [1, 2] and are generally caused by the weakening of the anal cushion and the supporting tissue and spasms of the internal sphincter [3]. Hemorrhoids can occur at different ages, and the prevalence of hemorrhoids in adults is 11% [4]. With an increase in age, the incidence rate gradually increases, which seriously affects people’s quality of life. The main symptoms of hemorrhoids are bleeding, prolapsing, pain, swelling, itching, and mucous soiling. Although hemorrhoids are not malignant, the symptoms of hemorrhoids can have negative psychological and physical effects on patients, and even may induce secondary anemia or massive bleeding that could threaten the life and health of patients [5, 6].

Grade III/IV hemorrhoids according to Goligher’s classification often require surgical treatment [7, 8]. In recent years, various surgical operations have been used to treat symptomatic hemorrhoids. Hemorrhoidectomy is the first choice for patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids because of its clear effect and high success rate [9, 10]. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (MMH) is one of the most widely used and representative operations. However, the procedure is associated with postoperative pain and bleeding [11], which is the main reason why patients are afraid and reluctant to undertake the procedure [12].

To reduce the occurrence of pain, bleeding, and other complications after MMH, we adopted MMH combined with non-Doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation (MMH + ND-HAL), a new combined operation, to overcome some limitations of MMH. The key characteristic of this combined operation mode was that it not only could remove hemorrhoid tissue but also reduced the occurrence of severe incision pain and bleeding and other complications after MMH. At present, no data are available to compare the efficacy and safety of MMH + ND-HAL and MMH; thus, the purpose of this article was to retrospectively compare and analyze the effectiveness and safety of these two operations.

Materials and methods

Patients

We retrospectively analyzed 115 cases of patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids who received surgical treatment in the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University between March 2019 and March 2021, of which 53 patients received MMH + ND-HAL, and the remaining 62 patients received MMH. The inclusion criteria of this study were as follows: (1) grade III/IV hemorrhoids (Goligher’s classification); and (2) age 18 to 65 years old, regardless of gender. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) accompanied by other anorectal diseases, such as perianal abscess, fistula, anal fissure, or inflammatory bowel disease; (2) patients with hypertension, diabetes, or abnormal liver and kidney functions; (3) patients who previously underwent hemorrhoid surgery; and (4) patients with coagulation dysfunction. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University. All operations were performed by experts with senior professional titles in anorectal surgery.

Data collection

All relevant data saved in the computer database after operation were collected retrospectively. The following parameters were recorded and analyzed: age, sex, grade of hemorrhoids, duration of disease, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at each time point after surgery (the first defecation after surgery, as well as the 12th hour, 1st day, 3rd day, and 7th day after surgery), and total analgesic consumption within 7 days. We collected data on the incidence of postoperative complications, including minor bleeding, perianal incision edema, acute urinary retention, anal stenosis, and anal incontinence. After the operation, patients were rechecked in the anorectal clinic of our hospital every week until they were fully recovered. Follow-up was conducted by telephone or outpatient at 12 months to assess the recurrence (prolapse or bleeding) rate and patient satisfaction. Patient satisfaction was evaluated on a 5-point scale of very dissatisfied, somewhat dissatisfied, normal, somewhat satisfied, and very satisfied. “Satisfaction” was defined as the sum of somewhat satisfied and very satisfied.

Surgical procedures

The MMH + ND-HAL procedure was performed according to the following steps: (1) The patients received spinal anesthesia and were placed in the lithotomy position; the anal canal and the lower end of the rectum were disinfected with 0.5% iodophor; and the distribution of hemorrhoids after anal dilatation was observed (Fig. 1A). (2) About 2–3 cm above the dentate line, the index finger was used to find the pulsating hemorrhoidal artery (Fig. 1B). (3) The hemorrhoids were exposed with allis forceps, and the pulsating hemorrhoidal arteries were ligated with 2 − 0 absorbable suture. Generally, the ligation position was 3, 7, or 11 o’clock points above the dental line. The ligation depth could not be too shallow or too deep, and the degree was submucosa (Fig. 1C). (4) MMH was performed according to the standard technique described by Milligan and Morgan [13] (Fig. 1D).

Fig. 1
figure 1

A The patient was placed in the lithotomy position, and the distribution of hemorrhoids was observed after anal enlargement. B Using the index finger to find the pulsating hemorrhoidal artery. C Exposing hemorrhoids with allis forceps, and ligating the pulsating hemorrhoidal artery with 2 − 0 absorbable suture. D MMH was performed

Full size image

Postoperative management

Postoperative management included the prohibition of food and water, lying flat for 6 h, stool control for 24 h, intravenous drip of antibiotics (cefuroxime) for 2 days to prevent infection, clean anus, and change of dressing after defecation. When the pain of the patient was intolerable, the oral analgesic nimesulide dispersible tablets (0.1 g/tablet) were given and the dose was recorded.

Statistical analysis

We used SPSS version 25.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) for analysis. Continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation, and the t-test was performed. We analyzed categorical variables using the Pearson chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test. The data were regarded as statistically significant when P < 0.05.

Result

Patient characteristics

We enrolled a total of 53 patients in the MMH + ND-HAL group (among which 45 patients had grade III hemorrhoids, and 8 patients had grade IV hemorrhoids) and 62 patients in the MMH group (52 patients had grade III hemorrhoids, 10 patients had grade IV hemorrhoids). There were no significant differences in age, sex, duration of disease, hemorrhoid grade, or number of surgical incisions between the two groups, but intraoperative bleeding in the MMH + ND-HAL group was less than in the MMH group (P < 0.05) (Table 1).

Table 1 Patient characteristics
Full size table

Complications

In the MMH + ND-HAL group, postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for pain at the first defecation, 12 h, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, and 7 days after operation were lower than those in the MMH group (P < 0.05). In addition, the total analgesic consumption within 7 days in the MMH + ND-HAL group was less than in the MMH group (P < 0.05), as shown in Table 2. The incidence of postoperative bleeding, perianal incision edema, and acute urinary retention in the MMH + ND-HAL group was lower than that in the MMH group (P < 0.05), and neither group experienced anal stenosis or anal incontinence, as shown in Table 3.

Table 2 Postoperative visual analog scale for pain, total analgesic consumption over 7 days
Full size table
Table 3 Postoperative complications
Full size table

Postsurgical recurrence and patient satisfaction at 12 months

To track the long-term outcomes and satisfaction of patients, follow-up visits were conducted by telephone or outpatient visits at 12 months after surgery. No patients in the MMH + ND-HAL group had recurrence (prolapse or bleeding), whereas 6 patients (9.68%) in the MMH group had recurrence (prolapse or bleeding) (P < 0.05). The satisfaction of the MMH + ND-HAL group (96.23%) was higher than that of the MMH group (82.54%) (P < 0.05), as shown in Table 4.

Table 4 Follow-up at 12 months
Full size table

Discussion

At present, many treatment methods are available for hemorrhoids, including conservative treatment, instrument treatment, and surgical treatment, such as hemorrhoidectomy, stapler hemorrhoidectomy (SH), and Doppler-guided/-assisted HAL [14,15,16]. Although MMH has obvious postoperative pain, secondary bleeding, long recovery period, and other shortcomings, MMH is still the preferred surgical method for patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids because of its exact curative effect, low recurrence rate, and cost-effectiveness [17,18,19].

Complications such as pain and bleeding after MMH, however, cannot be ignored. Haksal et al. [20] reported that among 206 patients who underwent MMH, 24 patients (12.9%) had bleeding symptoms within 7 days of the operation, and 2 patients underwent reoperations for bleeding. Even if multimodal pain management is implemented, poor postoperative pain relief is still a major problem. Gerbershagen et al. [21] performed a retrospective analysis of 115,775 patients from 578 surgical wards of 105 German hospitals and found that post-hemorrhoidectomy pain ranked 23rd out of 529 definitive surgical procedures. Gallardo et al. [22] found that 22.2% of patients after MMH had to take opioid analgesics. Therefore, to address these problems, we jointly adopted a new combined procedure method of MMH + ND-HAL to address some of the limitations of MMH and to meet the current requirements of minimally invasive surgery and rapid rehabilitation.

HAL blocks the blood supply of hemorrhoids by ligating the arteries and vessels supplying hemorrhoids, thus promoting hemorrhoid tissue atrophy and reducing hemorrhoid prolapse symptoms. Compared with hemorrhoidectomy, HAL has the advantages of less pain, less bleeding, and rapid recovery of working ability, but the recurrence rate is high [23, 24]. In this study, we found that the combination of HAL and MMH could take advantage of their respective advantages, improve efficacy, and reduce the recurrence rate. In HAL, a Doppler probe is used to locate and ligate the hemorrhoid artery, or the artery can be palpated and ligated with fingers without the help of the Doppler probe. Schuurman et al. [25] conducted a blinded randomized clinical trial of HAL with or without a Doppler transducer in patients with grade II and III hemorrhoids, and the results showed that HAL significantly reduced signs and symptoms of hemorrhoid disease, but the Doppler transducer did not contribute to this beneficial effect. Naqvi et al. [26] also reported that in terms of postoperative pain, bleeding, and patient satisfaction, HAL without Doppler guidance was an effective method to treat hemorrhoids. Therefore, compared with Doppler-guided HAL under direct vision, no significant difference has been observed in symptom improvement, pain, bleeding, prolapse, and other complications. Additionally, the equipment requirements are low and the operation is relatively simple. During the operation, because the purpose is to prevent rectal stenosis, it is important to be cautious of the HAL points, which should not be kept in the same plane, and the ligation points should not be too numerous (generally 3, 7, or 11 o’clock points).

Our study results show that compared with MMH, MMH + ND-HAL reduced intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.05), showing that ligation of hemorrhoidal arteries by ND-HAL can block the blood supply of hemorrhoids, thus reducing intraoperative bleeding. In terms of the VAS score at the first defecation, as well as that 12 h, 1 day, 2 days, 3 days, and 7 days after the operation, the MMH + ND-HAL group had lower scores than the MMH group (P < 0.05). The total analgesic consumption within 7 days in the MMH + ND-HAL group was lower than in the MMH group (P < 0.05), which indicated that MMH + ND-HAL effectively relieved the pain of surgical incision and reduced the consumption of painkillers. Postoperative bleeding, edema, urinary retention, anal stenosis and other complications are often associated with MMH. Our research results showed that both groups of patients did not have anal stenosis or anal incontinence. The incidence of postoperative bleeding, perianal incision edema, and acute urinary retention was lower in the MMH + ND-HAL group than in the MMH group (P < 0.05), which showed that the combined operation could reduce the incidence of postoperative bleeding and perianal incision edema, relieved the postoperative pain, made the urine excretion smooth, and reserved enough skin or mucosal bridges during the operation, which had little impact on anal function. Li et al. [27] also showed that compared with the traditional MMH, the MMH combined with HAL significantly reduced the amount of intraoperative bleeding and the incidence of postoperative bleeding and anal edema. After 12 months of follow-up, the recurrence rate of the MMH + ND-HAL group was lower than that of the MMH group (P < 0.05), and satisfaction was higher in the MMH + ND-HAL group than in the MMH group (P < 0.05). These results indicated that the combined operation on the basis of hemorrhoid resection and HAL could block the hemorrhoid blood supply [28,29,30], locally cause a chronic inflammatory reaction, produce tissue fibrosis, make the mucous membrane and submucosal supporting tissue adhesion and fixation, and reduce the postoperative recurrence rate, and improve patient satisfaction. At the same time, this combined operation can reduce postoperative pain, which may be related to lifting the rectal mucosa above the internal hemorrhoids after HAL, reducing the degree of prolapse of internal hemorrhoids, and thus reducing the surgical incision for MMH.

The limitations of this study include the small sample size, single-center study, short postoperative follow-up, and limited results. It is feasible to further expand the sample size, incorporate a multicenter study, and extend the follow-up time to improve findings.

Conclusion

MMH + ND-HAL had fewer complications, lower recurrence rate, and higher patient satisfaction than MMH alone. Therefore, MMH + ND-HAL appears to be a satisfactory surgical procedure in the treatment of grade III/IV hemorrhoids.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.Pata F, Sgrò A, Ferrara F, Vigorita V, Gallo G, Pellino G. Anatomy, physiology and pathophysiology of haemorrhoids. Rev Recent Clin Tria. 2021;16(1):75–80.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lohsiriwat V. Treatment of hemorrhoids: a coloproctologist’s view. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(31):9245–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamana T. Japanese practice guidelines for anal disorders I. hemorrhoids. J Anus Rectum Colon. 2017;1(3):89–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sheikh P, Régnier C, Goron F, Salmat G. The prevalence, characteristics and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease: results of an international web-based survey. J Comp Effect Res. 2020;9(17):1219–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Muldoon R. Review of american society of Colon and rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of hemorrhoids. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(8):773–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Koh FH, Foo FJ, Ho L, Sivarajah SS, Tan WJ, Chew MH. Study protocol for the use of conventional open haemorrhoidectomy versus laser haemorrhoidoplasty in the treatment of symptomatic haemorrhoids: a randomized controlled trial. Euro Surg Res. 2020;61(6):201–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. De Schepper H, Coremans G, Denis MA, Dewint P, Duinslaeger M, Gijsen I, Haers P, Komen N, Remue C, Roelandt P, Somers M, Van de Surmont M, Van Kemseke C, De Looze D. Belgian consensus guideline on the management of hemorrhoidal disease. ACTA GASTRO-ENT BELG. 2021;84(1):101–20.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rubbini M, Ascanelli S. Classification and guidelines of hemorrhoidal disease: present and future. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2019;11(3):117–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. 9 Shanmugam V, Thaha MA, Rabindranath KS, Campbell KL, Steele RJ, Loudon MA. Systematic review of randomized trials comparing rubber band ligation with excisional haemorrhoidectomy. Brit J Surg. 2005;92(12):1481–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kazachenko E, Garmanova T, Derinov A, Markaryan D, Lee H, Magbulova S, Tsarkov P. Preemptive analgesia for hemorrhoidectomy: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial. Trials. 2022;23(1):536.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11 Bhatti MI, Sajid MS, Baig MK. Milligan-Morgan (Open) versus ferguson haemorrhoidectomy (closed): a systematic review and Meta- analysis of published randomized, controlled trials. World J Surg. 2016;40(6):1509–19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ho YH, Buettner PG. Open compared with closed hemorrhoidectomy: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Tech Coloproctol. 2007;11(2):135–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Milligan ETC, Morgan CN, Jones LE, Officer R. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal and the operative treatment of hemorrhoids. Lancet. 1937;230:1119–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. van Tol RR, Kleijnen J, Watson AJM, Jongen J, Altomare DF, Qvist N, Higuero T, Muris JWM, Breukink SO. European Society of Coloproctology: guideline for haemorrhoidal disease. Colorectal Dis. 2020;22(6):650–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davis BR, Lee-Kong SA, MigalyJ, Feingold DL, Steele SR. The american society of Colon and rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2018;61(3):284–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gallo G, Martellucci J, Sturiale A, Clerico G, Milito G, Marino F, Cocorullo G, Giordano P, Mistrangelo M, Trompetto M. Consensus statement of the italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of hemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(2):145–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lu M, Shi GY, Wang, Wu Y, Liu Y, Wen H. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy with anal cushion suspension and partial internal sphincter resection for circumferential mixed hemorrhoids. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(30):5011–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Abbas ST, Raza A, Muhammad Ch I, Hameed T, Hasham N, Arshad N. Comparison of mean pain score using topical and oral metronidazole in post milligan morgan hemorrhoidectomy patient; a randomized controlled trial. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(5):867–71.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Medina-Gallardo NA, De Castro X, De Caralt-Mestres E, Curbelo-Peña Y, Dardano-Berriel A, Serrat Puyol J, Roura-Poch P, Vallverdu-Cartie H. Infiltration of Bupivacaine and Triamcinolone in Surgical Wounds of Milligan-Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy for Postoperative Pain Control: a double-blind randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2022;65(8):1034–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Haksal MC, Çiftci A, Tiryaki Ç, Yazıcıoğlu MB, Özyıldız M, Yıldız SY. Comparison of the reliability and efficacy of LigaSure hemorrhoidectomy and a conventional Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy in the surgical treatment of grade 3 and 4 hemorrhoids. Turkish J Surg. 2017;33(4):233–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, Peelen LM, Kalkman CJ, Meissner W. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(4):934–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Medina-Gallardo A, Curbelo-Peña Y, De Castro X, Roura-Poch P, Roca-Closa J, De Caralt-Mestres E. Is the severe pain after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy still currently remaining a major postoperative problem despite being one of the oldest surgical techniques described? A case series of 117 consecutive patients. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;30:73–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. De Nardi P, Capretti G, Corsaro A, Staudacher C. A prospective, randomized trial comparing the short- and long-term results of doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoid dearterialization with mucopexy versus excision hemorrhoidectomy for grade III hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57(3):348–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferrandis C, De Faucal D, Fabreguette JM, Borie F. Efficacy of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation with mucopexy, in the short and long terms for patients with hemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol. 2020;24(2):165–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schuurman JP, Borel Rinkes IH, Go PM. Hemorrhoidal artery ligation procedure with or without Doppler transducer in grade II and III hemorrhoidal disease: a blinded randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2012;255(5):840–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Qamar Naqvi SR, Qamar Naqvi SS, Rashid MM, Sheikh IA, Ali M, Nafees AUA. Haemorrhoidal artery ligation operation without Doppler Guidance. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2018;30(Suppl 1):664–S667.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Li B, Li X, Zhang Q, Zhao WB. Milligan-Morgan procedure combined with hemorrhoidal artery ligation in the treatment of III-IV degree mixed hemorrhoids. China Med Pharm. 2022;12(8):133–6.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Symeonidis D, Spyridakis M, Zacharoulis D, Tzovaras G, Samara AA, Valaroutsos A, Diamantis A, Tepetes K. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy vs. hemorrhoid artery ligation and recto-anal repair: a comparative study. BMC Surg. 2022;22(1):416.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Ratto C, Campennì P, Papeo F, Donisi L, Litta F, Parello A. Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for hemorrhoidal disease: a single-center study on 1000 consecutive cases and a review of the literature. Tech Coloproctol. 2017;21(12):953–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Karkalemis K, Chalkias PL, Kasouli A, Chatzaki E, Papanikolaou S, Dedemadi G. Safety and effectiveness of hemorrhoidal artery ligation using the HAL-RAR technique for hemorrhoidal disease.LANGENBECK. ARCH SURG. 2021;406(7):2489–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank all authors for their contributions to the article.

Funding

The authors received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, 646000, Sichuan, China

    Qing Long, Yong Wen & Jun Li

Authors
  1. Qing Long
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong Wen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jun Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Long Q and Li J designed the concept of the study; Long Q and Wen Y collected and analyzed the data; Long Q and Li J wrote the draft manuscript; all authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University and conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.All methods were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations.Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Long, Q., Wen, Y. & Li, J. Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with non-doppler hemorrhoidal artery ligation for the treatment of grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a single centre retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 23, 293 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12876-023-02933-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12876-023-02933-x

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us