Skip to main content
Download PDF

Osteosarcopenia predicts poor survival in patients with cirrhosis: a retrospective study

BMC Gastroenterology volume 23, Article number: 196 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Osteosarcopenia, defined as the coexistence of sarcopenia and osteoporosis, is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. The present study investigated the prognostic significance of osteosarcopenia in patients with cirrhosis.

Methods

This retrospective study evaluated 126 patients with cirrhosis. Participants were classified into three groups based on the presence or absence of (1) sarcopenia and/or osteoporosis; and (2) Child–Pugh (CP) class B/C cirrhosis and/or osteosarcopenia, and the cumulative survival rates were compared between the groups.

Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent factors associated with mortality. Sarcopenia and osteoporosis were diagnosed according to the Japan Society of Hepatology and the World Health Organization criteria, respectively.

Results

Among the 126 patients, 24 (19.0%) had osteosarcopenia. Multivariate analysis identified osteosarcopenia as a significant and independent prognostic factor. The cumulative survival rates were significantly lower in patients with osteosarcopenia than in those without (1/3/5-year survival rates = 95.8%/73.7%/68.0% vs. 100%/93.6%/86.5%, respectively; p = 0.020). Patients with osteosarcopenia, but not sarcopenia or osteoporosis alone, had significantly lower cumulative survival rates than those without both conditions (p = 0.019). Furthermore, patients with both CP class B/C and osteosarcopenia had significantly lower cumulative survival rates than those without both (p < 0.001) and with either condition (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Osteosarcopenia was significantly associated with mortality in patients with cirrhosis. The cumulative survival rates were lower in patients with osteosarcopenia than in those without both conditions. Additionally, comorbid osteosarcopenia worsened the prognosis of patients with CP class B/C. Therefore, simultaneous evaluation of both sarcopenia and osteoporosis is crucial to better predict the prognosis.

Peer Review reports

Background

Sarcopenia, characterized by progressive decreases in skeletal muscle mass and function, is recognized as a frequent and serious complication in patients with cirrhosis [1]. In 2016, the Japan Society of Hepatology (JSH) proposed practical criteria for sarcopenia in chronic liver disease (CLD) [2]. Protein-energy malnutrition, hyperammonemia, decreased levels of anabolic hormones (e.g., insulin-like growth factor 1) and branched-chain amino acids, and elevated levels of inflammatory cytokines cause an imbalance between protein synthesis and proteolysis, leading to sarcopenia [2, 3]. Recent studies have shown that sarcopenia increases the risk of cirrhosis-related complications, such as ascites, infections, hepatic encephalopathy, and mortality [4,5,6,7]. A meta-analysis of 22 studies confirmed that sarcopenia increases the mortality risk by approximately 2-fold in patients with cirrhosis [8].

Osteoporosis, characterized by loss of bone mass and deterioration of bone microarchitecture, also is a common complication in patients with cirrhosis [9]. Similar to the pathogenesis of sarcopenia, malnutrition, dysregulation of the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) ligand (RANKL)/RANK/osteoprotegerin system due to chronic inflammation, and decreased levels of anabolic hormone and 25-hydroxyvitamin D cause an imbalance in the activities of osteoblasts and osteoclasts, leading to osteoporosis [10]. Osteoporosis and associated major osteoporotic fractures increase the mortality risk in the general population [11]. However, a meta-analysis of eight studies revealed that effective osteoporosis treatments can reduce the mortality rate by approximately 10% in older frail individuals who have a high risk of fracture [12]. Therefore, early and appropriate assessment and therapeutic intervention are crucial from a prognostic standpoint. Although the relationship between osteoporosis and mortality remains to be determined, patients with cirrhosis have a significantly higher risk of post-fracture complications, such as sepsis, acute renal failure, and 30-day in-hospital mortality [13]. Therefore, evaluating muscle and bone diseases together may be crucial to better predict liver disease-related events and prognosis in patients with cirrhosis.

Muscles and bones are closely interrelated during growth and maintenance by common factors, such as genetic factors, myokines, and osteokines [3]. Consequently, sarcopenia and osteoporosis often develop or progress simultaneously, and the term osteosarcopenia was coined in 2009 to define the coexistence of these comorbidities [14]. Osteosarcopenia is associated with malnutrition and aggravates the risk of falls, fractures, and impaired physical performance in older adults, leading to reduced quality of life and poor prognosis [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. The prevalence of osteosarcopenia is reportedly 16.8% in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) [22]. This condition has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of patients, such as an increased prevalence of vertebral fractures and frailty [22]. Despite the well-known relationship between osteosarcopenia and mortality in the general population, only one report has evaluated this relationship in patients with CLD [23]. However, it was limited to only patients who underwent hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and did not assess handgrip strength, which is a fundamental component of the diagnosis criteria for sarcopenia. In the present study, we diagnosed sarcopenia following the JSH criteria (including the assessment of handgrip strength) [2] and aimed to investigate the impact of osteosarcopenia on the prognosis of patients with cirrhosis who had no HCC.

Methods

Participants

In this retrospective study, we analyzed 126 consecutive patients with cirrhosis who visited Fuji City General Hospital between 2017 and 2020. This study cohort included 118 patients analyzed in our previous report [9]. The inclusion criteria were (1) presence of cirrhosis diagnosed on the basis of laboratory tests and endoscopic/imaging findings, such as the presence of esophageal/gastric varices, ascites, liver deformations, and surface irregularities; and (2) consent to undergo muscle and bone measurement tests. The exclusion criteria were (1) pre-existence of malignant diseases, including hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC);　and (2) presence of a pacemaker, implants, or refractory ascites. Serum albumin, total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Mac-2 binding protein glycosylation isomer (M2BPGi, a hepatic fibrosis marker), platelet, and prothrombin time–international normalized ratio (PT–INR) were measured using standard laboratory methods. The fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index was calculated using the following formula: FIB-4 = age (years) × AST (U/L)/(platelet count [109 /L] × ALT1/2 [U/L]) [24]. Liver functional reserve was evaluated using the Child–Pugh (CP) classification and model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score [25, 26]. HCC was diagnosed according to the HCC guidelines of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases [27]. Patients who underwent liver transplantation during the observation period were considered to be dead and censored cases.

Diagnosis of sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and osteosarcopenia

Sarcopenia was diagnosed according to the revised criteria proposed by the Japan Society of Hepatology (second edition) [28]. In brief, sarcopenia is defined as skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) < 7.0 kg/m2 for men and < 5.7 kg/m2 for women, measured using bioimpedance analysis (InBody S10; InBody, Seoul, Korea), and handgrip strength < 28 kg for men and < 18 kg for women, measured using a dynamometer (T.K.K5401 GRIP-D; Takei Scientific Instruments, Niigata, Japan). Gait speed was measured over a distance of 6 m, and slow gait speed was defined as < 0.8 m/s [29]. Osteoporosis was diagnosed using the World Health Organization (WHO) criteria (T-score ≤  − 2.5) [30]. The bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine (L2–L4), femoral neck, and total hip was assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (PRODIGY; GE Healthcare Japan, Tokyo, Japan). At least one of these three measurements met the WHO criteria in the diagnosis of osteoporosis. Osteosarcopenia was defined as the coexistence of sarcopenia and osteoporosis [14].

Statistical analysis

Continuous and categorical variables are presented as median (interquartile range) and number (percentage), respectively. Between-group differences were assessed using the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous variables and the chi-squared test for categorical variables. Correlations between BMD and SMI or handgrip strength were analyzed using the Spearman's rank correlation test. The cumulative survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and were compared between the groups using the log-rank test and the Bonferroni multiple comparisons method. Significant and independent factors associated with mortality were identified using univariate and multiple Cox proportional hazards models. SPSS Statistics version 27 (IBM Japan, Tokyo, Japan) was used for all statistical analyses. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Study population and characteristics

A flow diagram of patients included in this study is shown in Figure S1. Of the 156 patients with cirrhosis evaluated for eligibility, 30 met the exclusion criteria and the remaining 126 patients were enrolled. Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics of the participants. This study cohort included 77 (61.1%) men, with a median age of 70. 5 (57.8–76.0) years. The median MELD score was 9.0 (7.0–12.0). The rate of CP class B or C (B/C) was 34.9% (44/126).

Table 1 Comparison of clinical characteristics between patients with and without osteosarcopenia
Full size table

Clinical characteristics of patients with and without osteosarcopenia

The prevalence of osteosarcopenia was 19.0% (24/126; Table 1). Men accounted for 41.7% and 65.7% of patients with and without osteosarcopenia, respectively, with osteosarcopenia being more frequent in women (p = 0.030). Patients with osteosarcopenia were significantly older (p = 0.001) and had lower body mass index (BMI) (p < 0.001) and higher prevalence of slow gait speed (p < 0.001) than those without osteosarcopenia. Regarding laboratory data, patients with osteosarcopenia had lower PT–INR levels than those without (p = 0.030). The most frequent etiologies were hepatitis C virus in the osteosarcopenia group and alcohol in the non-osteosarcopenia group.

Correlations between BMD and SMI or handgrip strength

The SMI and handgrip strength were significantly correlated with BMD at lumbar spine (r = 0.378 and 0.291; p < 0.001 and = 0.010, respectively), femoral neck (r = 0.547 and 0.458; p < 0.001 for both, respectively), and total hip (r = 0.519 and 0.402; p < 0.001 for both, respectively) in men (Figure S2A–S2F). Similarly, these sarcopenia-related factors were significantly correlated with BMD at lumbar spine (r = 0.427 and 0.413; p = 0.002 and = 0.003, respectively), femoral neck (r = 0.442 and 0.527; p = 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively), and total hip (r = 0.490 and 0.520; p < 0.001 for both, respectively) in women (Figure S3A–S3F).

Prognostic factors in patients with cirrhosis

The median observation period was 57.1 (44.2–61.6) months, during which 16.7% (21/126) of the patients died from liver disease-related events (liver failure, n = 12; liver transplantation, n = 1; HCC, n = 3; and rupture of esophageal varices, n = 5) (Figure S1). Univariate analysis revealed that BMI, CP class B/C, MELD score, sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and osteosarcopenia were significantly associated with mortality (Table S1). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis identified CP class B/C (hazard ratio [HR], 7.045; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.692–18.441; p < 0.001) osteosarcopenia (HR, 4.798; 95%CI, 1.885–12.212; p = 0.001) as significant and independent prognostic factors in patients with cirrhosis (Table 2).

Table 2 Significant factors associated with mortality in patients with liver cirrhosis
Full size table

Impact of sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and osteosarcopenia on survival

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 97.4% vs. 100%, 78.6% vs. 94.9%, and 71.8% vs. 88.0% in the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups, respectively, showing they were significantly lower in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group (p = 0.024, Fig. 1A).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cumulative survival rates in patients with and without sarcopenia (A), osteoporosis (B), and osteosarcopenia (C)

Full size image

The cumulative survival rates were significantly lower in the osteoporosis group than in the non-osteoporosis group (p = 0.024, Fig. 1B). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 97.6% vs. 100%, 82.7% vs. 93.4%, and 74.0% vs. 87.5% in the osteoporosis group and non-osteoporosis group, respectively.

Regarding the difference in prognoses, the cumulative survival rates were significantly lower in the osteosarcopenia group than in the non-osteosarcopenia group (p = 0.020, Fig. 1C). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative survival rates were 95.8% vs. 100%, 73.7% vs. 93.6%, and 68.0% vs. 86.5% in the osteosarcopenia and non-osteosarcopenia groups, respectively.

On the basis of the presence or absence of sarcopenia and/or osteoporosis, we classified the patients into three groups: (i) patients without both sarcopenia and osteoporosis (n = 69), (ii) patients with sarcopenia alone or osteoporosis alone (n = 33), and (iii) patients with osteosarcopenia (n = 24). Patients with osteosarcopenia (but not either condition alone) had significantly lower cumulative survival rates than those without both conditions (p = 0.019) (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Prognostic impact of osteosarcopenia on patients with cirrhosis. Patients with osteosarcopenia had significantly lower survival rates than those without both sarcopenia and osteoporosis (p = 0.019)

Full size image

Impact of comorbidity of CP class B/C cirrhosis and osteosarcopenia on survival

We classified the patients into three groups based on the presence or absence of CP class B/C cirrhosis and/or osteosarcopenia: (i) patients without both CP class B/C and osteosarcopenia (n = 64), (ii) patients with either condition alone (n = 56), and (iii) patients with both conditions (n = 6). Patients with both conditions had significantly lower cumulative survival rates than those without both (p < 0.001) and with either condition alone (p < 0.001) (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Prognostic impact of the coexistence of Child–Pugh class B/C cirrhosis and osteosarcopenia. The cumulative survival rates were significantly lower for patients with either or both conditions than for those without both conditions (p = 0.037 or < 0.001, respectively). There was a significant difference in the cumulative survival rates between patients with either and both conditions (p < 0.001)

Full size image

Discussion

Sarcopenia and osteoporosis are closely interrelated with each other and often develop or progress simultaneously (i.e., osteosarcopenia) [9]. Indeed, bone mass was significantly correlated with muscle mass or muscle strength in both men and women in this study. Osteosarcopenia increases the risk of falls, fractures, and mortality, leading to reduced quality of life and adverse outcomes [15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. As such, this condition has attracted a great deal of attention in recent years. This is the first study to focus on the relationship between osteosarcopenia and prognosis of cirrhotic patients without HCC. In this study, multivariate analysis identified osteosarcopenia as a significant and independent factor associated with mortality. Of note, patients with osteosarcopenia had lower survival rates than those without both conditions. Additionally, comorbid osteosarcopenia worsened the prognosis of patients with CP class B/C.

In one study of community-dwelling older adults, mortality was significantly higher in participants with osteosarcopenia (HR, 2.48) than in those without [17]. However, neither sarcopenia nor osteoporosis alone were significantly associated with increased mortality, similar to the results of the present study. In another study of patients with hip fracture, the 1-year mortality rate was higher (15.1%; HR, 1.84) for patients with osteosarcopenia than for those without osteosarcopenia (without both sarcopenia and osteoporosis, 7.8%; with sarcopenia alone, 10.3%; and with osteoporosis alone, 5.1%) [16]. Furthermore, osteosarcopenia was reported to be one of the strongest prognostic factors for patients who underwent hepatic resection for HCC, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and colorectal liver metastases [23, 31, 32]. A pooled analysis of three cohort studies, including 2,601 participants, revealed that osteosarcopenia significantly increased the mortality risk, with an odds ratio of 1.66 [18]. These findings indicate that osteosarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis, irrespective of underlying diseases or conditions, and emphasize that osteosarcopenia is more critical in predicting patient prognosis than sarcopenia or osteoporosis alone. Therefore, it is critically important to evaluate both sarcopenia and osteoporosis together in patients with cirrhosis.

Patients with cirrhosis frequently have malnutrition due to reduced energy and protein intake, malabsorption, altered nutrient metabolism, hormonal imbalance, hypermetabolism, and inflammation, leading to secondary sarcopenia and osteoporosis [33, 34]. Reportedly, nutritional status, as assessed by the mini nutritional assessment- short form, was worse in patients with osteosarcopenia than in those with sarcopenia or osteoporosis alone [20]. Malnourished patients had a significantly higher risk of cirrhosis-related complications requiring hospitalization (such as ascites, infections, and hepatic encephalopathy), sarcopenia, and mortality than well-nourished patients [35]. The coexistence of sarcopenia and osteoporosis aggravates physical performance, increasing the risk of falls, fractures, and frailty [15, 17,18,19,20,21]. Patients with lower physical performance and frailty were reported to be at higher risk for cirrhosis-related complications, hospital readmission, and mortality [36]. Collectively, patients with osteosarcopenia are more likely to develop liver disease-related events and worsen prognosis due to malnutrition and impaired physical performance.

The CP classification is widely used to evaluate liver functional reserve. This scoring system is a good predictor of prognosis in patients with cirrhosis; i.e., survival rates are lower for patients with CP class B/C than for those with CP class A [37]. In this study, patients with CP class B/C complicated by osteosarcopenia had the lowest survival rates among the three stratified groups. A previous study showed that the presence of sarcopenia reduced the cumulative survival rates in patients with CP class A/B [38]. Additionally, comorbid sarcopenia worsened the 2-year survival rates in patients with CP class C or MELD score > 14 [39]. Therefore, it is conceivable that combining osteosarcopenia with CP class B/C will identify patients with the most serious prognosis.

Given that osteosarcopenia is associated with poor prognosis, early and comprehensive therapeutic intervention is crucial for longevity. Reportedly, long-term branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) administration significantly improved muscle mass, muscle strength, and muscle function, and mortality in sarcopenic patients with cirrhosis [40, 41]. In this study, the rate of BCAA supplementation in the osteosarcopenia group was extremely low, suggesting the need for earlier nutritional intervention. In one study of CLD patients with osteoporosis, administration of denosumab, a human monoclonal antibody for RANKL, significantly improved BMD and bone quality marker (i.e., plasma pentosidine) [42]. Intriguingly, the 5-year denosumab treatment improved sarcopenia-related parameters (such as muscle strength and physical performance) as well as BMD in older adults [43]. In another study of older men with osteosarcopenia, high-intensity resistance training with vitamin D, calcium, and protein supplementation increased the SMI and maintained BMD [44]. Despite the importance of these treatments, early and appropriate assessment and intervention for osteosarcopenia remain undetermined in real-world clinical settings. In the future, treatment strategies for sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and osteosarcopenia should be established in patients with CLD from a prognostic perspective.

This study had some limitations. First, we did not investigate the patients’ nutritional intake or daily activities, which might have influenced the muscle and bone mass measurements. Second, patients with refractory ascites, who might be more susceptible to osteosarcopenia, were excluded due to the unreliability of the bioimpedance analysis.

Finally, the sample size was not large enough to evaluate the impact of osteosarcopenia on the patient prognosis.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study demonstrated that osteosarcopenia increases the mortality risk in patients with cirrhosis. Therefore, early and appropriate assessment and intervention for both sarcopenia and osteoporosis are crucial to improve the patient prognosis.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CI:

Confidence interval

CLD:

Chronic liver disease

CP:

Child–Pugh

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

HR:

Hazard ratio

MELD:

Model for end-stage liver disease

PT–INR:

Prothrombin time–international normalized ratio

RANK:

Receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa-B

SMI:

Skeletal muscle mass index

References

  1. Yoshiji H, Nagoshi S, Akahane T, Asaoka Y, Ueno Y, Ogawa K, et al. Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for liver cirrhosis 2020. Hepatol Res. 2021;51:725–49.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nishikawa H, Shiraki M, Hiramatsu A, Moriya K, Hino K, Nishiguchi S. Japan Society of Hepatology guidelines for sarcopenia in liver disease (1st edition): Recommendation from the working group for creation of sarcopenia assessment criteria. Hepatol Res. 2016;46:951–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Saeki C, Tsubota A. Influencing factors and molecular pathogenesis of sarcopenia and osteosarcopenia in chronic liver disease. Life (Basel). 2021;11:899.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kim G, Kang SH, Kim MY, Baik SK. Prognostic value of sarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0186990.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wijarnpreecha K, Werlang M, Panjawatanan P, Kroner PT, Cheungpasitporn W, Lukens FJ, et al. Association between sarcopenia and hepatic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Hepatol. 2020;19:245–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kikuchi N, Uojima H, Hidaka H, Iwasaki S, Wada N, Kubota K, et al. Prospective study for an independent predictor of prognosis in liver cirrhosis based on the new sarcopenia criteria produced by the Japan Society of Hepatology. Hepatol Res. 2021;51:968–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Zeng X, Shi ZW, Yu JJ, Wang LF, Luo YY, Jin SM, et al. Sarcopenia as a prognostic predictor of liver cirrhosis: a multicentre study in China. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2021;12:1948–58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Tantai X, Liu Y, Yeo YH, Praktiknjo M, Mauro E, Hamaguchi Y, et al. Effect of sarcopenia on survival in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis. J Hepatol. 2022;76:588–99.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Saeki C, Takano K, Oikawa T, Aoki Y, Kanai T, Takakura K, et al. Comparative assessment of sarcopenia using the JSH, AWGS, and EWGSOP2 criteria and the relationship between sarcopenia, osteoporosis, and osteosarcopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20:615.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Jeong HM, Kim DJ. Bone diseases in patients with chronic liver disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20:4270.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Shiraki M, Kuroda T, Tanaka S. Established osteoporosis associated with high mortality after adjustment for age and co-mobidities in postmenopausal Japanese women. Intern Med. 2011;50:397–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bolland MJ, Grey AB, Gamble GD, Reid IR. Effect of osteoporosis treatment on mortality: a meta-analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1174–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen TL, Lin CS, Shih CC, Huang YF, Yeh CC, Wu CH, et al. Risk and adverse outcomes of fractures in patients with liver cirrhosis: two nationwide retrospective cohort studies. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e017342.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Binkley N, Buehring B. Beyond FRAX: it’s time to consider “sarco-osteopenia.” J Clin Densitom. 2009;12:413–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirk B, Zanker J, Duque G. Osteosarcopenia: epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment-facts and numbers. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2020;11:609–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Yoo JI, Kim H, Ha YC, Kwon HB, Koo KH. Osteosarcopenia in Patients with Hip Fracture Is Related with High Mortality. J Korean Med Sci. 2018;33:e27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Salech F, Marquez C, Lera L, Angel B, Saguez R, Albala C. Osteosarcopenia predicts falls, fractures, and mortality in Chilean community-dwelling older adults. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2021;22:853–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Teng Z, Zhu Y, Teng Y, Long Q, Hao Q, Yu X, et al. The analysis of osteosarcopenia as a risk factor for fractures, mortality, and falls. Osteoporos Int. 2021;32:2173–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sepúlveda-Loyola W, Phu S, Bani Hassan E, Brennan-Olsen SL, Zanker J, Vogrin S, et al. The joint occurrence of osteoporosis and sarcopenia (Osteosarcopenia): definitions and characteristics. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21:220–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reiss J, Iglseder B, Alzner R, Mayr-Pirker B, Pirich C, Kässmann H, et al. Sarcopenia and osteoporosis are interrelated in geriatric inpatients. Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2019;52:688–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Okayama A, Nakayama N, Kashiwa K, Horinouchi Y, Fukusaki H, Nakamura H, et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia and its association with quality of life, postural stability, and past incidence of falls in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: a cross-sectional study. Healthcare (Basel). 2022;10:192.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Saeki C, Kanai T, Nakano M, Oikawa T, Torisu Y, Abo M, et al. Relationship between osteosarcopenia and frailty in patients with chronic liver disease. J Clin Med. 2020;9:2381.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Yanagaki M, Haruki K, Taniai T, Igarashi Y, Yasuda J, Furukawa K, et al. The significance of osteosarcopenia as a predictor of the long-term outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatic resection. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2022 Online ahead of print.

  24. Sterling RK, Lissen E, Clumeck N, Sola R, Correa MC, Montaner J, et al. Development of a simple noninvasive index to predict significant fibrosis in patients with HIV/HCV coinfection. Hepatology. 2006;43:1317–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Malinchoc M, Kamath PS, Gordon FD, Peine CJ, Rank J, ter Borg PC. A model to predict poor survival in patients undergoing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Hepatology. 2000;31:864–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Pugh RN, Murray-Lyon IM, Dawson JL, Pietroni MC, Williams R. Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices. Br J Surg. 1973;60:646–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Marrero JA, Kulik LM, Sirlin CB, Zhu AX, Finn RS, Abecassis MM, et al. Diagnosis, staging, and management of hepatocellular carcinoma: 2018 practice guidance by the American Association for the study of liver diseases. Hepatology. 2018;68:723–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nishikawa H, Shiraki M, Hiramatsu A, Hara N, Moriya K, Hino K, et al. Reduced handgrip strength predicts poorer survival in chronic liver diseases: a large multicenter study in Japan. Hepatol Res. 2021;51:957–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, et al. Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2019;48:16–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. WHO. Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Study Group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1994;843:1–129.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Taniai T, Haruki K, Yanagaki M, Igarashi Y, Furukawa K, Onda S, et al. Osteosarcopenia predicts poor prognosis for patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after hepatic resection. Surg Today. 2022 Online ahead of print.

  32. Furukawa K, Haruki K, Taniai T, Hamura R, Shirai Y, Yasuda J, et al. Osteosarcopenia is a potential predictor for the prognosis of patients who underwent hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2021;5:390–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Traub J, Reiss L, Aliwa B, Stadlbauer V. Malnutrition in patients with liver cirrhosis. Nutrients. 2021;13:540.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Walker-Bone K. Recognizing and treating secondary osteoporosis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2012;8:480–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Maharshi S, Sharma BC, Srivastava S. Malnutrition in cirrhosis increases morbidity and mortality. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;30:1507–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Essam Behiry M, Mogawer S, Yamany A, Rakha M, Awad R, Emad N, et al. Ability of the short physical performance battery frailty index to predict mortality and hospital readmission in patients with liver cirrhosis. Int J Hepatol. 2019;2019:8092865.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. D’Amico G, Garcia-Tsao G, Pagliaro L. Natural history and prognostic indicators of survival in cirrhosis: a systematic review of 118 studies. J Hepatol. 2006;44:217–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Kang SH, Jeong WK, Baik SK, Cha SH, Kim MY. Impact of sarcopenia on prognostic value of cirrhosis: going beyond the hepatic venous pressure gradient and MELD score. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9:860–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Zeng X, Shi ZW, Yu JJ, Wang LF, Luo YY, Jin SM, et al. Sarcopenia as a prognostic predictor of liver cirrhosis: a multicentre study in China. J Cachexia Sarcopenia M uscle. 2021;12:1948–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Singh Tejavath A, Mathur A, Nathiya D, Singh P, Raj P, Suman S, et al. Impact of branched chain amino acid on muscle mass, muscle strength, physical performance, combined survival, and maintenance of liver function changes in laboratory and prognostic markers on sarcopenic patients with liver cirrhosis (BCAAS Study): a randomized clinical trial. Front Nutr. 2021;8:715795.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hanai T, Shiraki M, Nishimura K, Ohnishi S, Imai K, Suetsugu A, et al. Sarcopenia impairs prognosis of patients with liver cirrhosis. Nutrition. 2015;31:193–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Saeki C, Saito M, Oikawa T, Nakano M, Torisu Y, Saruta M, et al. Effects of denosumab treatment in chronic liver disease patients with osteoporosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2020;26:4960–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Miedany YE, Gaafary ME, Toth M, Hegazi MO, Aroussy NE, Hassan W, et al. Is there a potential dual effect of denosumab for treatment of osteoporosis and sarcopenia? Clin Rheumatol. 2021;40:4225–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Kemmler W, Kohl M, Fröhlich M, Jakob F, Engelke K, von Stengel S, et al. Effects of high-intensity resistance training on osteopenia and sarcopenia parameters in older men with osteosarcopenia-one-year results of the randomized controlled Franconian Osteopenia and Sarcopenia Trial (FrOST). J Bone Miner Res. 2020;35:1634–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan

    Chisato Saeki, Tomoya Kanai, Kaoru Ueda, Masanori Nakano, Tsunekazu Oikawa, Yuichi Torisu & Masayuki Saruta

  2. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Fuji City General Hospital, Fuji-Shi, Shizuoka, Japan

    Chisato Saeki, Tomoya Kanai, Masanori Nakano & Yuichi Torisu

  3. Project Research Units, Research Center for Medical Science, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-Ku, Tokyo, Japan

    Akihito Tsubota

Authors
  1. Chisato Saeki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tomoya Kanai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kaoru Ueda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Masanori Nakano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tsunekazu Oikawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yuichi Torisu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Masayuki Saruta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Akihito Tsubota
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

C.S. participated in the conception and design of the study. C.S., T.K., K.U., M.N., and Y.T. acquired, analyzed, and interpreted the data. C.S. and A.T. drafted the manuscript. T.O., M.S., and A.T. interpreted the data and revised the manuscript. A.T. substantively revised and completed the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Chisato Saeki or Akihito Tsubota.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study and its protocols conform to the 2013 Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the ethics committee of Fuji City General Hospital (approval number: 279). The requirement for written informed consent from participants was waived by the ethics committee of Fuji City General Hospital due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Figure S1.

Flow diagram of patients included in this study.

Additional file 2: Figure S2.

Correlations between the skeletal muscle mass indexor handgrip strength and bone mineral densityof the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip in men. The SMI was significantly correlated with the BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. The handgrip strength was significantly correlated with the BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip.

Additional file 3: Figure S3.

Correlations between the skeletal muscle mass indexor handgrip strength and bone mineral densityof the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip in women. The SMI was significantly correlated with the BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip. The handgrip strength was significantly correlated with the BMD of the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and total hip.

Additional file 4: Table S1.

Univariate analysis of factors associated with mortality.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saeki, C., Kanai, T., Ueda, K. et al. Osteosarcopenia predicts poor survival in patients with cirrhosis: a retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 23, 196 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12876-023-02835-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12876-023-02835-y

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us