Skip to main content
Download PDF

Preoperative Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as a prognostic inflammation biomarker in Asian HIV-infected patients with gastric cancer: a single-center study

BMC Gastroenterology volume 23, Article number: 187 (2023) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The serum systemic inflammation biomarkers have been established as predictors of prognosis in gastric cancer (GC) patients, but their prognostic value in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected patients with GC has not been well studied. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative systemic inflammation biomarkers in Asian HIV-infected patients with GC.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 41 HIV-infected GC patients who underwent surgery between January 2015 and December 2021 at the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center. Preoperative systemic inflammation biomarkers were measured and patients were divided into two groups based on the optimal cut-off value. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were measured using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log-rank test. Multivariate analysis of variables was performed using the Cox proportional regression model. As a comparison, 127 GC patients without HIV infection were also recruited.

Results

The median age of the 41 patients included in the study was 59 years, with 39 males and two females. The follow-up period for OS and PFS ranged from 3 to 94 months. The cumulative three-year OS rate was 46.0%, and the cumulative three-year PFS rate was 44%. HIV-infected GC patients had worse clinical outcomes compared to the normal GC population. The optimal cut-off value for preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) was 199 in HIV-infected GC patients. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that a low PLR was an independent predictor of better OS and PFS (OS: HR = 0.038, 95% CI: 0.006–0.258, P < 0.001; PFS: HR = 0.027, 95% CI: 0.004–0.201, P < 0.001). Furthermore, higher preoperative PLR in HIV-infected GC was significantly associated with lower BMI, hemoglobin, albumin, CD4 + T, CD8 + T, and CD3 + T cell counts.

Conclusion

The preoperative PLR is an easily measurable immune biomarker that may provide useful prognostic information in HIV-infected GC patients. Our findings suggest that PLR could be a valuable clinical tool for guiding treatment decisions in this population.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) remains a major cause of cancer-related mortality globally [1]. While D2 gastrectomy and chemotherapy are the standard treatment, the prognosis for advanced stages is still unsatisfactory [2, 3]. In recent years, there has been an increase in GC cases among patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [4, 5]. H.pylori infection is a significant risk factor for GC, particularly in East-Asia, and HIV-induced immunodeficiency is thought to exacerbate this risk [4, 5]. Furthermore, HIV infection impairs the HIV-specific CD4 + T and CD8 + T lymphocytes, resulting in the inability of the host immune system to control HIV, which may lead to poorer outcomes of HIV-related cancers [6]. Early identification of the worse prognostic subgroup of HIV-infected GC is crucial for patients' survival [7].

Although molecular subtypes had the potential to identify GC patients with a worse prognosis, the results based on genomic data made them difficult to use in clinical practice. In addition to cancer-associated systemic inflammation, which is an important predictor of prognosis in GC patients, systemic inflammation biomarkers such as the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and systemic inflammation score (SIS) have been shown to be useful prognostic factors in numerous studies [8,9,10,11]. Building on previous research that suggests combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) can restore immune function in HIV-infected individuals [12] and that there may be no difference in tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes between HIV-positive and HIV-negative cancer [13], it may be feasible to evaluate systemic inflammatory biomarkers in HIV-infected GC patients. However, to our knowledge, no research has been conducted on the relationship between preoperative systemic inflammation biomarkers and HIV-infected GC. Early identification of these clinically feasible predictors could improve patients’ chances of survival. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of systemic inflammation biomarkers in HIV-related GC patients.

Methods

Patients

We conducted a retrospective study of 41 HIV-infected patients with preoperative pathologically diagnosed gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent gastrectomy (with or without standard lymphadenectomy) between January 2015 and December 2021 at Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center (SHPHC) in China. The study included characteristics such as gender, age, body mass index (BMI), disease history (hypertension, diabetes, tuberculosis infection, smoking, and alcohol abuse), duration of HIV infection and treatment (cART), preoperative tests (routine laboratory tests, tumor markers, and plasma lipids), tumor location, pathological stage (using the AJCC 8th edition), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2) status (using immunohistochemical results of Her2 proteins), and surgical resection with or without tumor residuals. For comparison, we also retrospectively recruited 127 non-HIV infected patients diagnosed with gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent surgery treatment in our hospital during the same period. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center.

Follow-up

Regular follow-ups were conducted every three months during the first year after surgery and every six months for the following two years. Patients were admitted to the hospital for routine blood examination, enhanced chest and abdominal CT scans, and other necessary tests. After three years, the follow-up visits were scheduled annually. Progression was defined as the first detection of local recurrence, enlargement of unresected tumor lesions, and distant organ metastases. Death was confirmed through relevant information provided by the hospital or by notification from the patient's family during a telephone follow-up. The last censoring date for evaluating survival time was March 2022. Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time interval from surgery to death from any cause or the last censoring date. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time interval from surgery to progression or the last censoring date. Two of the 41 patients were lost to follow-up during the study period.

Definition of inflammation-based biomakers

The laboratory tests from each patient were obtained within 1-week before surgical resection of the primary tumour. In recent reports, neutrophil (N; × 10^9/L) to lymphocyte (L; × 10^9/L) ratio (NLR), lymphocyte (L; × 10^9/L) to monocyte (M; × 10^9/L) ratio (LMR) and platelet (P; × 10^9/L) to lymphocyte (L; × 10^9/L) ratio (PLR) had been evaluated as useful prognostic biomarkers of GC patients [14, 15]. The prognostic nutritional index (PNI) was calculated as serum albumin value (g/L) + 5 × lymphocyte (L; × 10^9/L) [16]. The systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) was calculated based on platelet (P; × 10^9/L), neutrophil (N; × 10^9/L), and lymphocyte (L; × 10^9/L) blood counts using the following formula: SII = P × N/L [17]. The systemic inflammation score (SIS) definition was based on the combination of the preoperative albumin level and LMR [9]. The SIS was defined as follows: patients with albumin level < 40 g/L and LMR < 4.44 were assigned a score of 2; patients with either albumin level ≥ 40 g/L or LMR ≥ 4.44 were assigned a score of 1; and patients with both albumin level ≥ 40 g/L and LMR ≥ 4.44 were assigned a score of 0.

Statistics

Categorical variables were reported as integers and proportions, and continuous variables were reported as medians, means (standard deviations), and maximum ranges. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and chi-square for classified variables. To analyze the survival differences, patients were categorized into two group based on the continuous variables best-cutoff using the “MaxStat” R package (maximally selected log-rank statistics) [18]. The Kaplan–Meier survival curves were constructed according to differences in group, which were analyzed using the log-rank test. Variables that significantly affected survival were estimated by univariate and multivariate analysis according to the Cox regression model. Stratifified survival analysis results were discussed based on clinicopathological features. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were determined using R software (version 3.6.3, http://www.r-project.org).

Results

Patient characteristics

The clinicopathological characteristics of 41 HIV-infected patients with gastric cancer (GC) who underwent gastrectomy are summarized in Table S1. Of the 41 patients, 39 were male and two were female, with a median age of 59 years (range: 44–76 years) at the time of surgery. The median body mass index (BMI) was 21.1 (range: 15.1–26.6), and 22.0% of patients had a history of hypertension, 17.1% had diabetes, 4.9% had tuberculosis infection, and 17.1% had hyperlipidemia. Eight patients (19.5%) had a history of smoking, and five (12.2%) had a history of alcohol abuse. The median duration of HIV infection was one month, and most patients had not received anti-HIV treatment. The preoperative test showed a mean CD4 + T lymphocyte count of 323.4 cell/µL and a CD8 + T lymphocyte count of 663.3 cell/µL. Based on postoperative pathology, 7 patients (17.1%) had an upper gastric tumor, 31 (75.6%) had a middle gastric tumor, and 3 (7.3%) had a tumor in the lower part of the stomach. According to the eighth edition of the AJCC TNM staging system, 9 (22.0%), 8 (19.5%), 19 (46.3%), and 5 (12.2%) of patients had stages I, II, III, and IV, respectively.

Survival outcomes

The follow-up time for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) ranged from 3 to 94 months. The cumulative three-year OS rate was 46.0%, and the cumulative three-year PFS rate was 44%. HIV-infected GC patients had significantly worse OS and PFS outcomes compared to non-HIV infected GC patients (Figure S1). Univariate analysis identified several inflammatory indicators associated with OS, including PLR, PNI, and Alb level (P < 0.05, Table 1). Variables such as BMI, history of signet ring cell, R0 resection, and TNM stage also significantly affected OS (P < 0.05, Table 1). In multivariate analyses, PLR ≤ 199.0 (HR: 0.038, 95% CI: 0.006–0.258), histology of signet ring cell (HR: 41.178, 95% CI: 6.287–269.722), and no R0 resection (HR: 277.461, 95% CI: 10.475–7349.318) were associated with OS (both P < 0.05, Table 1). Additionally, the prognostic effect of NLR, PLR, PNI, SII, BMI, histology of signet ring cell, R0 resection, TNM stage, and Alb level was significantly related to PFS in univariate analysis (Table 2). In multivariate analysis of PFS, PLR ≤ 199.0 (HR: 0.027, 95% CI: 0.004–0.201), histology of signet ring cell (HR: 42.638, 95% CI: 6.245–291.092), and no R0 resection (HR: 136.565, 95% CI: 8.048–2317.405) were independently associated with PFS outcomes (both P < 0.05, Table 2). In non-HIV infected GC patients, inflammatory indicators such as PLR were not associated with OS (Table S2) or PFS (Table S3) in univariate analysis. The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and log-rank tests were conducted to investigate the association between PLR groups and postoperative survival time. Our results showed that PLR (> 199) was significantly associated with decreased OS and PFS (Fig. 1). We also evaluated the OS and PFS subgroups of HIV-infected GC patients. The Kaplan–Meier curves revealed that CD3 + count > 1022 cells/µL, both CD8 + groups, and CD4 + count > 323.4 cells/µL in the high PLR group (> 199) were closely associated with poor OS (Fig. 2). Additionally, CD3 + count > 998.8 cells/µL, both CD8 + groups, CD4 + count > 291.3 cells/µL, and CD4/CD8 > 0.6 in the high PLR group (> 199) were also associated with poor PFS rate (Fig. 3).

Table 1 Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic variables in relation to OS in patients living with HIV for GC
Full size table
Table 2 Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic variables in relation to PFS in patients living with HIV for GC
Full size table
Fig. 1
figure 1

The Kaplan–Meier survival analysis of overall survival and progression free survival according to PLR in HIV-related GC

Full size image
Fig. 2
figure 2

Subgroup analysis of OS based on age, BMI, AJCC stage, albumin level, CD3 cell counts, CD4 cell counts, CD8 cell counts and CD4/CD8 ratio

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

Subgroup analysis of PFS based on age, BMI, AJCC stage, albumin level, CD3 cell counts, CD4 cell counts, CD8 cell counts and CD4/CD8 ratio

Full size image

The relationship between PLR and clinical characteristics

The relationship between clinicopathological variables and PLR was summarized in Table 3. Higher PLR values were associated with lower BMI (19.7 vs 21.7, P = 0.005), a longer duration of HIV treatment (32.2 months vs 20.9 months, P = 0.113), and a higher tendency for advanced stages (III-IV: 76.9% vs 50.0%, P = 0.173). The comparison of PLR with preoperative laboratory tests was shown in Table 4. In addition to platelet and lymphocyte counts, mean values of hemoglobin (126.9 g/L vs 104.2 g/L, P = 0.008), albumin (39.7 g/L vs 36.5 g/L, P = 0.041), CD3 + cells count (1196.1 per uL vs 646.9 per uL), CD4 + cells count (373 per uL vs 216.5 per uL), and CD8 + cells counts (784.2 per uL vs 402.8 per uL) were significantly higher in the low PLR group than in the high PLR group. However, neutrophil counts were significantly higher in the high PLR group (4.7 × 10^3/uL) than in the low PLR group (3 × 10^3/uL).

Table 3 Relationship between PLR and clinicopathological features in GC patients living with HIV
Full size table
Table 4 Relationship between PLR and preoperative laboratory tests in GC patients living with HIV
Full size table

Discussion

During the era of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), the incidence of infection-related cancers increased in people living with HIV (PLWH) compared to the general population [4, 5, 19]. The longer life expectancy of PLWH exposed them to chronic infections such as herpes virus 8, human papillomavirus, hepatitis viruses, and H. pylori, leading to chronic inflammation and cancer development. However, common epithelial cancers without chronic pathogenic infections did not occur at higher rates, including colorectal, breast, and prostate cancers [4, 5, 20]. H.pylori infection was a major risk factor for gastric cancer in the general population, and due to dietary habits, its incidence may be increasing in PLWH in China. Reports suggested that PLWH with gastrointestinal cancer were less likely to receive cancer screening or regular treatment, leading to higher mortality than HIV-negative patients [7, 19]. Furthermore, few studies had examined the association of HIV status with gastric cancer treatment [21]. Our study found that HIV-infected gastric cancer patients had a three-year overall survival rate of only 46%, much lower than the average [3] and GC patients in the general population (Figure S1). Therefore, easily achievable prognostic predictors for patients with HIV-infected GC are needed, so that subgroups of patients with poorer prognoses can be identified earlier, and interventions and follow-up can be initiated. The preoperative systemic inflammation biomarker has proven reliable in various cancers, making it worthwhile to investigate in HIV-positive GC patients.

This study investigated the prognostic value of six systemic inflammation biomarkers (NLR, LMR, PLR, PNI, SII, and SIS) in HIV-infected gastric cancer (GC) patients and compared their prognostic value with non-HIV-infected GC patients at the same center (Table S2 and 3). Previous studies have shown that systemic inflammation biomarkers are useful prognostic factors of gastrointestinal carcinomas [10, 15, 22, 23]. Our results revealed that among surgically treated HIV-infected GC patients, those with high platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) than those with low PLR. Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that PLR was an independent factor influencing survival outcomes. The findings emphasize the importance of considering systemic inflammation biomarkers, particularly PLR, as prognostic predictors in HIV-infected GC patients.

Lymphocytes play a crucial role in the peritumoral inflammatory response, which reflects the cancer immunosurveillance in the host [24]. Low serum lymphocyte counts have been linked to poor outcomes in patients with gastric cancer (GC) [25]. Platelets, the typical blood cell component responsible for the inflammatory response, are often increased in patients with solid tumors associated with chronic inflammation [26]. In the tumor microenvironment, platelets can interact directly with cancer cells and promote tumorigenesis by releasing pro-angiogenic proteins such as vascular epidermal growth factor and transforming growth factor β [27]. They can also protect circulating tumor cells from host immune surveillance by creating a defense barrier around them [17]. Thus, a higher platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) indicates a greater susceptibility of tumors to immune escape and progression. The PLR has been found to be negatively correlated with patients' survival outcomes in gastric [28], lung [29], urological [30], colorectal [31] and breast cancer [32]. Currently, PLR has significant references for the surgical selection and prognosis of HIV-infected GC patients.

To investigate the correlation between PLR and clinicopathological features, we divided all HIV-infected GC patients into high and low PLR groups according to the cut-off values. The results showed that higher PLR was significantly associated with lower BMI, hemoglobin, and albumin levels (Tables 3 and 4), indicating preoperative malnutrition. This may be one of the reasons explaining the poorer prognosis in the high PLR group. In addition, the high PLR subgroup had a high percentage of postoperative stage III-IV (76.9% vs 50.0%), suggesting a negative correlation between preoperative result of PLR and postoperative disease severity in HIV-infected GC patients (Table 3). Circulating lymphocytes, which are recruited from the bone marrow and differentiate into various types, play a crucial role in accomplishing an anti-tumor response in the tumor microenvironment [33]. In our study, lower PLR was associated with higher peripheral CD4 + and CD8 + T cell counts (Table 4). Moreover, PLR had better predictive value in subgroups with high CD3 + , CD4 + , and CD8 + T cell counts (Figs. 2 and 3). We hypothesized that serum PLR levels may reflect the recovered status of tumor-specific lymphocytes in HIV-infected GC patients, but this needs further research. Furthermore, the high PLR subgroup showed increased neutrophil counts. Neutrophil counts in the circulation were observed to increase during tumor progression [34], but the relationship between neutrophils and PLR in HIV-related GC patients remains unclear.

While this study provides the insights into the prognostic value of PLR in HIV-infected GC patients, there are some limitations that should be considered. Firstly, the relatively small sample size and lack of validation using an independent cohort may have potential for selection bias. It is challenging to collect sufficient number of HIV-related GC cohorts due to the rarity, inadequate knowledge and discriminatory attitudes of this disease. Therefore, collaboration with other HIV treatment centers is crucial to validate the broader applicability of PLR in the future. Secondly, the absence of preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) data prevented the analysis of CRP-related markers, which may have provided additional prognostic information. Moreover, the lack of data on H.pylori infection history limited the exploration of the relationship between inflammation biomarkers and GC exposure factors. Therefore, future studies with larger sample sizes, multi-center, and a more comprehensive analysis of exposure factors are necessary to further elucidate the differences in the prognostic value of inflammation biomarkers in HIV-infected GC patients.

Conclusion

With the availability of combination antiretroviral therapy (cART), the incidence of gastric cancer (GC) is increasing in individuals infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Our study demonstrates that preoperative platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) can serve as an independent biomarker of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in HIV-infected GC patients, reflecting their immune status. This simple prognostic biomarker could potentially be used to stratify patients' preoperative risks, which enables personalized treatment for patients with HIV and gastric cancer.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:7–33. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3322/caac.21654.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoshikawa T, Sasako M. Gastrointestinal cancer: Adjuvant chemotherapy after D2 gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9:192–4. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/nrclinonc.2012.23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yoshikawa T, Morita S, Tanabe K, Nishikawa K, Ito Y, Matsui T, Fujitani K, Kimura Y, Fujita J, Aoyama T, et al. Survival results of a randomised two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two and four courses of S-1 plus cisplatin (SC) and paclitaxel plus cisplatin (PC) followed by D2 gastrectomy for resectable advanced gastric cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2016;62:103–11. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.04.012.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Grulich AE, van Leeuwen MT, Falster MO, Vajdic CM. Incidence of cancers in people with HIV/AIDS compared with immunosuppressed transplant recipients: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2007;370:59–67. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61050-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yuan T, Hu Y, Zhou X, Yang L, Wang H, Li L, Wang J, Qian H, Clifford GM, Zou H. Incidence and mortality of non-AIDS-defining cancers among people living with HIV: A systematic review and meta-analysis. eClinicalMedicine. 2022;52:101613. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101613.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen CH, Chung CY, Wang LH, Lin C, Lin HL, Lin HC. Risk of cancer among HIV-infected patients from a population-based nested case-control study: implications for cancer prevention. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:133. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12885-015-1099-y.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Coghill AE, Han X, Suneja G, Lin CC, Jemal A, Shiels MS. Advanced stage at diagnosis and elevated mortality among US patients with cancer infected with HIV in the National Cancer Data Base. Cancer-Am Cancer Soc. 2019. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/cncr.32158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Okugawa Y, Toiyama Y, Yamamoto A, Shigemori T, Ichikawa T, Yin C, Suzuki A, Fujikawa H, Yasuda H, Hiro J, et al. Lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio and score are clinically feasible nutrition-inflammation markers of outcome in patients with gastric cancer. Clin Nutr. 2020;39:1209–17. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.clnu.2019.05.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lin J, Lin J, Xie J, Wang J, Lu J, Chen Q, Cao L, Lin M, Tu R, Zheng C, et al. Prognostic importance of the preoperative modified systemic inflammation score for patients with gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2019;22:403–12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s10120-018-0854-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Xin-Ji Z, Yong-Gang L, Xiao-Jun S, Xiao-Wu C, Dong Z, Da-Jian Z. The prognostic role of neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio and platelet count in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis. Int J Surg (London, England). 2015;21:84–91. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim EY, Lee JW, Yoo HM, Park CH, Song KY. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio versus neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio: which is better as a prognostic factor in gastric cancer? Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:4363–70. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1245/s10434-015-4518-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gonzalez-Cao M, Martinez-Picado J, Karachaliou N, Rosell R, Meyerhans A. Cancer immunotherapy of patients with HIV infection. Clin Transl Oncol. 2019;21:713–20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s12094-018-1981-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cao Y, Wu Q, Lian S, Deng L. Lymphocytes Infiltration and expression of PD-1 and PD-L1 in colorectal cancer between HIV-Infected and non-HIV-infected patients: a propensity score matched cohort study. Front Oncol. 2022;12, https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3389/fonc.2022.827596.

  14. Jung MR, Park YK, Jeong O, Seon JW, Ryu SY, Kim DY, Kim YJ. Elevated preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts poor survival following resection in late stage gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2011;104:504–10. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1002/jso.21986.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Deng Q, He B, Liu X, Yue J, Ying H, Pan Y, Sun H, Chen J, Wang F, Gao T. et al. Prognostic value of pre-operative inflammatory response biomarkers in gastric cancer patients and the construction of a predictive model. J Transl Med. 2015;13. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12967-015-0409-0.

  16. Toyokawa T, Muguruma K, Yoshii M, Tamura T, Sakurai K, Kubo N, Tanaka H, Lee S, Yashiro M, Ohira M. Clinical significance of prognostic inflammation-based and/or nutritional markers in patients with stage III gastric cancer. BMC Cancer. 2020;20. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12885-020-07010-0.

  17. Hirahara N, Tajima Y, Matsubara T, Fujii Y, Kaji S, Kawabata Y, Hyakudomi R, Yamamoto T, Uchida Y, Taniura T. Systemic immune-inflammation index predicts overall survival in patients with gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021;25:1124–33. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s11605-020-04710-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nenclares P, Gunn L, Soliman H, Bover M, Trinh A, Leslie I, Wong KH, Melcher A, Newbold K, Nutting CM, et al. On-treatment immune prognostic score for patients with relapsed and/or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with immunotherapy. J Immunother Cancer. 2021;9. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1136/jitc-2021-002718.

  19. Robbins HA, Pfeiffer RM, Shiels MS, Li J, Hall HI, Engels EA. Excess cancers among HIV-infected people in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jnci/dju503.

  20. Coghill AE, Engels EA, Schymura MJ, Mahale P, Shiels MS. Risk of Breast, Prostate, and Colorectal Cancer Diagnoses Among HIV-Infected Individuals in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2018;110:959–66. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1093/jnci/djy010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Pumpalova YS, Segall L, Felli R, Bhatkhande G, Jacobson JS, Neugut AI. The Impact of HIV on Non-AIDS defining gastrointestinal malignancies: a review. Semin Oncol. 2021;48:226–35. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1053/j.seminoncol.2021.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Yamamoto T, Kawada K, Obama K. Inflammation-related biomarkers for the prediction of prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:8002. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms22158002.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Kudou K, Nakashima Y, Haruta Y, Nambara S, Tsuda Y, Kusumoto E, Ando K, Kimura Y, Hashimoto K, Yoshinaga K, et al. Comparison of inflammation-based prognostic scores associated with the prognostic impact of adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction and upper gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2021;28:2059–67. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1245/s10434-020-08821-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD. The immunobiology of cancer immunosurveillance and immunoediting. USA: Elsevier Inc. 2004;21:137–48. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1016/j.immuni.2004.07.017.

  25. Eo WK, Jeong DW, Chang HJ, Won KY, Choi SI, Kim SH, Chun SW, Oh YL, Lee TH, Kim YO, et al. Absolute monocyte and lymphocyte count prognostic score for patients with gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:2668–76. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3748/wjg.v21.i9.2668.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Stone RL, Nick AM, McNeish IA, Balkwill F, Han HD, Bottsford-Miller J, Rupairmoole R, Armaiz-Pena GN, Pecot CV, Coward J, et al. Paraneoplastic thrombocytosis in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:610–8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1056/NEJMoa1110352.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu L, Zou J, Guan Y, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Zhou X, Xiong C, Tolbert E, Zhao TC, Bayliss G, et al. Blocking the histone lysine 79 methyltransferase DOT1L alleviates renal fibrosis through inhibition of renal fibroblast activation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition. FASEB J. 2019;33:11941–58. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1096/fj.201801861R.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Inaoka K, Kanda M, Uda H, Tanaka Y, Tanaka C, Kobayashi D, Takami H, Iwata N, Hayashi M, Niwa Y, et al. Clinical utility of the platelet-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of postoperative complications after radical gastrectomy for clinical T2–4 gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23:2519–26. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3748/wjg.v23.i14.2519.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhang H, Gao L, Zhang B, Zhang L, Wang C. Prognostic value of platelet to lymphocyte ratio in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2016;6:22618. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/srep22618.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Li DY, Hao XY, Ma TM, Dai HX, Song YS. The prognostic value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in urological cancers: a meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:15387. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/s41598-017-15673-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Huang XZ, Chen WJ, Zhang X, Wu CC, Zhang CY, Sun SS, Wu J. An elevated platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Markers. 2017;2017:1053125. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1155/2017/1053125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang M, Huang XZ, Song YX, Gao P, Sun JX, Wang ZN. High platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts poor prognosis and clinicopathological characteristics in patients with breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:9503025. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1155/2017/9503025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. De Palma M, Biziato D, Petrova TV. Microenvironmental regulation of tumour angiogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:457–74. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1038/nrc.2017.51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ustyanovska AN, Visser N, Bremer E, Wiersma VR. The neutrophil: the underdog that packs a punch in the fight against cancer. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijms21217820.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The present study was supported by the clinical research program of Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (KY-WJ-2021-01).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Li Deng, Lei Li and Yiling Qiu contributed equally to this work and share first authorship.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of General Surgery, Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Li Deng, Lei Li, Ye Cao, Shixian Lian & Yanhui Si

  2. Department of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China

    Yiling Qiu

Authors
  1. Li Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yiling Qiu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ye Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shixian Lian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yanhui Si
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

LD and YHS conceived the study. LD, LL and YLQ co-wrote the paper. LL, YC and SXL collected all data and undertook the search. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Li Deng or Yanhui Si.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center (Grant No. 2022-S022-01). The consent to participate was waived by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center as this study was a retrospective analysis that presents no risk, does not adversely affect the rights of the subjects. All methods were performed in accordance with the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1: Table S1.

Baseline clinicopathologic features and preoperative laboratory tests of GC patients living with HIV. Table S2. Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic variables in relation to OS in GC patients without HIV infection. Table S3. Univariate and multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic variables in relation to PFS in GC patients without HIV infection. Figure S1. The Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival between HIV-related and non-HIV related GC patients.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Deng, L., Li, L., Qiu, Y. et al. Preoperative Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) as a prognostic inflammation biomarker in Asian HIV-infected patients with gastric cancer: a single-center study. BMC Gastroenterol 23, 187 (2023). https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12876-023-02828-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1186/s12876-023-02828-x

Keywords

BMC Gastroenterology

ISSN: 1471-230X

Contact us